C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Boya Bogam Pedda Maddilety – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C. Praveen Kumar, J.
1. A1, A5, A6, A9, A10 and A11 are the appellants herein. Originally, these six [06] accused alongwith six [06] more were tried on seven [07] charges.
All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. The gravamen of the charges against the accused is that, on 11.5.2008 at about 1.00 p.m., all the accused found themselves into an unlawful assembly and in pursuance of common object of that assembly, caused the death of one Telugu Ranganna ['deceased'] near Gokulapadu Village. Further, A3 is said to have caused hurt to PW 5 by means of dagger, while, A1 is said to have caused injuries to A6. Apart from that, all the accused threatened PW 1, PW 3 and PW 5 with dire consequences.
3. The facts, as culled out, from the evidence of prosecution witnesses are as under:
(ii) PW 3 is the elder brother of PW 1. All the material witnesses know the accused as they are residents of the same village. The father o
Balka Singh and others v. State of Punjab
Zwinglee Ariel v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Ugar Ahir and others v. State of Bihar
Jakki @ Selvaraj and another v. State
Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Prem Singh and others v. State of Haryana
Ranjit Singh and others v. State of Madhya Pradesh
In Re: Poreddi Venkata Reddy and Ors. v. Unknown
Rabindra Mahto and another v. State of Jharkhand
Marudanal Augusti v. State of Kerala
Hari Obula Reddy and others v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Rana Pratap v, State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.