C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
Madhiri Satish – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C. Praveen Kumar, J.
Heard Sri Challa Ajay Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant and Sri Soora Venkat Sainath, Assistant Public Prosecutor, through Blue Jeans video conferencing APP.
1. The sole accused in Sessions Case No. 329 of 2012 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada, filed the present appeal challenging his conviction and sentence imposed therein.
2. The appellant herein was charged for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 376 and 420 I.P.C. By its judgment dated 12.01.2015 the learned Sessions Judge convicted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 376 I.P.C. and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to, pay a fine of 5,000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for one month. He was also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 417 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for two weeks. He was also found guilty for the offence punishable under Section 411 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of
Anurag Soni v. State of Chhattisgarh 2019 (2) ALT (Crl.) 211 (SC) : (2019) 13 SCC 1
Dr. Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v. State of Maharashtra (2019) 18 SCC 191
Kailash Gour and others v. State of Assam (5) 2012 (3) ALT (Crl.) 28 (SC) : AIR 2012 SC 786
Maheswar Tigga v. the 'State of Jharkhand (2020) 10 SCC 108
Pramod Suryaban Pawar v. State of Maharashtra (2019) 9 SCC 608
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.