SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 132

SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Paturu Sundaraiah – Appellant
Versus
Suri Ranganayakamma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Marri Venkata Ramana.
For the Respondent: Madhava Rao Nalluri.

JUDGMENT :

The unsuccessful defendant filed the present second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short “CPC”), aggrieved by the decree and judgment, dated 28.02.2020 passed in A.S.No.33 of 2017 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Kovur, SPSR Nellore District confirming the decree and judgment, dated 11.09.2017 passed in O.S.No.316 of 2005 on the file of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur.

2. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the parties shall be referred to as they are arrayed in the O.S.No.316 of 2005.

3. Plaintiffs, sisters, filed suit O.S.No.316 of 2005 against the defendant for declaration of title and for ejectment of the defendant from land of an extent of Ac.0-90 cents out of total extent of Ac.2-55 cents in survey No.708 with patta No.126 situated in Varini village, Vidavaluru Mandal, Nellore District (hereinafter referred to “schedule property”).

4. In the plaint, it was contended inter alia that the schedule property originally belonged to N. Venkata Reddy; that the grandfather of the plaintiffs purchased the schedule property and other extent under registered sale deed, dated 11.03.1959; that plaintiff’s grandfather die

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top