IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, J.
Smt. Nannagaram Praveena D/o Krishnaiah – Petitioner
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 38026 of 2015
Decided On : 15-12-2021
A.P. (SC/ST & BC) Issue of Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificate Rules, 1997 – Rule 9(7) – Whether certificate is genuine or not under Rule 9(7) of Rules of 1997 and before taking a decision, she should give a reasonable opportunity to petitioner by giving a copy of District Level Scrutiny Committee report to petitioner and inviting objections from her – Held, In view of facts and circumstances, as procedure contemplated under Act 16 of 1993 and Rules of 1997 are not followed, impugned proceedings of Collector cancelling caste certificate, and impugned notification are liable to be set aside and same are accordingly set aside and matter is remitted back to 2nd respondent to decide matter afresh after giving copy of report of Scrutiny Committee to petitioner and giving opportunity to submit her explanation – After receipt of explanation from petitioner, if District Collector comes to an opinion that certificate was obtained fraudulently, he/she shall give petitioner an opportunity of making a representation before issuing a notification cancelling community certificate – Entire exercise has to be completed as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period months from date of receipt of order – Writ petition allowed.
ORDER :
1. This writ petition is filed to declare the proceedings of the Collector and District Magistrate, Nellore District dated 03.11.2015 and the Notification dated 03.11.2015, cancelling the caste certificate of the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to Rule 9(7) of the A.P. (SC/ST & BC) Issue of Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificate Rules, 1997 read with Act 16 of 1993.
2. Case of the petitioner is that:
(ii) Pursuant to the said recommendation, Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Ms. No. 20, Backward Classes Welfare (C2) Department dated 04.07.2008, including the caste of ‘Agamudi Mudaliar’ (Thuluva Vellalas) in the list of BC under Group-D for the purpose of Article 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution of India; prior to inclusion of the above caste in BC-D, petitioner and others were considered under open category; pursuant to the said G.O. petitioner made an application to the Tahsildar, Naidupet Mandal for issuance of BC-D certificate and after verification, he issued BCD certificate on 02.09.2008 in favour of the petitioner; while so, pursuant to the notification dated 07.12.2008, petitioner applied to the post of Telugu Pandit Grade-II in SPSR Nellore District and she was selected under BC-D quota and joined the service on 22.10.2009.
(iii) One S. Veeraswamy, alleged to have made a complaint, before the Collector on 10.10.2011 alleging that the petitioner produced a false certificate, due to which his wife was not selected for the said post; pursuant to the said complaint, the Sub Collector, directed the Tahsildar to cause an enquiry with regard to the caste certificate of the petitioner and the Tahsildar enquired into the matter and issued proceedings dated 05.12.2011, stating that the certificate of the petitioner issued by the then Tahsildar is genuine; thereafter, the Collector issued proceedings dated 20.12.2013 directing the Revenue Divisional Officer to make an enquiry; the Revenue Divisional Officer after conducting enquiry issued proceedings dated 27.12.2013 stating that the claim of the petitioner is genuine; wife of the said Veeraswamy, who is the 6th respondent herein filed W.P. No. 22891 of 2014 alleging that she made a complaint before the District Collector on 27.05.2011 and that the same was not looked into, pursuant to which, the Revenue Divisional Officer again directed the petitioner to attend the enquiry on 24.01.2015 and the Revenue Divisional Officer submitted a report on 05.02.2015 stating that Mudaliar is not listed in backward classes and that the petitioner do not belong to ‘Agamudi Mudaliar’ (Thuluva Vellalas) and hence, petitioner’s case was placed before the District Level Scrutiny Committee; the District Level Scrutiny Committee issued notice in Form-VI to the petitioner on 10.03.2015 requiring her to attend for enquiry on 24.03.2015; except recording the statement of the petitioner, no further proceedings were held in her presence; the District Collector, Nellore issued proceedings dated 03.11.2015 under Section 5(1) of the A.P. (SC/ST & BCs) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act (for short ‘Act 16 of 1993’) read with Rule 9(7) of AP (SC/ST & BC) Issue of Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificate Rules, 1997 (for short ‘Rules 1997’) observing that the Distri
A.K. Kraipak vs. Union of India
Bokkam Ramam vs. District Collector, Visakhapatnam
Jadhav Rekoba vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh
K. Suraj Singh vs. The Collector and District Magistrate, Kadapa
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
M. Karunakar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Mohinder Singh Gill vs. Chief Election Commissioner
Radhy Shyam vs. State of U.P. (2011) 5 SCC 553
Sayeedur Rehman vs. State of Bihar
Caste certificate cancellation requires adherence to natural justice, including the right to a hearing, as established in the Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes Regulation of Issu....
Point of law : As seen from sub-rule (10) of Rule 9, the Commissioner of Tribal Welfare/Director of Tribal Welfare, either suo motu or on a written complaint by any person made by an employer/educati....
The Sub-Divisional Officer lacks jurisdiction to cancel caste certificates; only the High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee can do so after following due process.
The court upheld the cancellation of Caste Certificates for lack of evidence supporting ST-Lambada status and confirmed adherence to principles of natural justice during proceedings.
Repeated inquiries for verification of caste certificates would be detrimental to members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Reopening of inquiry into caste certificates can be only in case th....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that a person with a case based on falsehood has no right to approach the Court, and knowingly producing fabricated and fraudulent documents to ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.