IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Central Andhra Junior College – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos.17559, 17344, 17753, 17849, 18336, 18372, 18041, 18225 & 18045 of 2021
Decided on : 06-09-2021
Intermediate Education Act, 1971 – A.P. Education Act, 1982 – Section 2(12), 99(3) –A.P. Educational Institutions (Establishment, Recognizing, Administration and Control of Institutions of Higher Education) Rules, 1987 – Rule 14(7) – Whether Notification issued by BIE/4th respondent styled as “Andhra Pradesh Online Admission System for Intermediate Stream (APOASIS) – Can be treated as policy decision of Andhra Pradesh State Government and is valid in eye of law – Held, Thus, to sum up, impugned notification cannot be treated as delegation of power and authority by executive Government to BIE to frame rules, rather the notification is an outcome of BIE’s order – Notification is not sustainable in eye of law since it has no statutory back up; not divulged objective sought to be achieved and not addressed corresponding rights of stakeholders – Further, as rightly pointed out by petitioners, when students were automatically passed in qualifying examination (SSC) in view of prevalence of COVID-19 pandemic, it is incomprehensible as to how admissions in intermediate will be made on merit basis. It is no doubt submitted on behalf of respondents that on basis of marks obtained in internal examinations, ranks will be allotted basing on which admissions will be made – Therefore, impugned notification is liable to be set aside – It is submitted on behalf of respondents that already about few lakhs of students submitted online applications for admissions in intermediate course – However, that cannot be a ground to sustain an otherwise lopsided notification – Order will not preclude State Government from making in future, legislation/rules/regulations on subject ‘admissions into intermediate stream’ by clearly laying down policy, keeping in view corresponding rights of stakeholders and giving wide and advance publicity – No costs – Writ Petitions allowed.
ORDER :
This batch of writ petitions is a sequel to W.P.No.20052 of 2020 and batch. The earlier batch of writ petitions were filed challenging the press release dated 20.10.2020 issued by the Secretary, Board of Intermediate Education, Andhra Pradesh (for short, ‘the BIE’) introducing online mode of admission into two year intermediate courses in general and vocational streams in various colleges for the academic session 2020-21. Those batch of writ petitions mainly targeted the manner in which the new method of admission into intermediate courses was introduced by way of sheer press release. It was inter alia contended in that batch that the new method was introduced hurriedly by issuing urgent press note stating the process of admission would commence from 21.10.2020 and conclude on 29.10.2020 without explaining the reasons for issuing such a hurried press note instead of State Government introducing its intention by way of a policy through a legislation or in the form of proper regulations or guidelines after consulting all stakeholders. It was also contended that the lopsided new method of admissions, curtailed the inherent right of the students to choose the college of their choice to study intermediate and also the right to admission of educational institutions. It was also contended, in the proposed method of admission into intermediate colleges there was no possibility of evaluating comparative merit of the students because due to the prevalence of COVID-19 pandemic, all the students in the 10th class, were declared as passed by virtue of G.O.Ms.No.34, dated 14.07.2020. Therefore, for allotment of students to different colleges, there is no logical basis.
2. Per contra, learned Additional Advocate General contended, to prevent illegal practices like collection of capitation fee etc. by certain institutions the online system was introduced in the public interest. Wide publicity was also given before introduction of new method. Further multiple options were given to students to choose colleges of their interest by applying through online method.
3. Hearing both sides, this Court in the earlier batch of writ petitions agreed with the argument of petitioners and allowed the batch of writ petitions with the following direction:
4. While so, the admissions into intermediate studies for the academic year 2021-22 is concerned, the BIE, pursuant to the A.P. Government’s Memo No.1477968/1E-A2/2021-1 dated 10.08.2021 ratifying the BIE’s draft Notification and instructing it to take further action, issued the Notification for online admissions 2021-22 in respect of two year intermediate course in general and vocational streams through online mode in the Government/private aided/private unaided/cooperative, incentive junior colleges and composite degree colleges in the State.
Academy of Nutrition Improvement v. Union of India
Council for Civil Services Unions v. Minister for Civil Services
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education v. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheth
Federation of Railway Officers Association v. Union of India
H.B.Gandhi, Excise and Taxation Officer-cum-Assessing Authority, Karnal v. M/s. Gopinath & Sons
Hinsa Virodhak Sangh v. Mirzapur Moti Kuresh Jamat
Mohinder Singh Gill v. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi
Om Kumar and ors. v. Union of India
P.H. Paul Manoj Pandian v. P. Veldurai, (2011) 5 SCC 214 = (2011) 2 SCC (Civ) 681
Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur v. The State of Punjab, [1955] 2 SCR 225 = MANU/SC/0011/1955
Sterling Computers Limited v. M & N Publications Limited
State of Punjab v. Ram Lubhaya Bagga
Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab
The State of Maharaashtra v. Lok Shikshan Sansatha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.