Back
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Chintala Ram Babu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition for a mandamus is filed to declare the action of respondent 2- Visakhapatnam Metropolitan Region Development Authority (VMRDA) in interfering with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the land covered by plot nos. 14 and 15 in an extent of 543 Sq. yards and 491.25 Sq. yards covered by Sy. No. 335/5 of Madhurawada Village, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently sought direction to the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the said land.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration appearing for the 1st respondent and Sri V. Surya Kiran Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, appearing for respondent 2-VMRDA.
3. The petitioner claims to be the owner of the land in question covered by Sy. No. 335/5 bearing plot Nos. 14 and 15 situated in Madhurawada Village of Visakhapatnam. The petitioner asserts that one Alka Shroff was the owner of the said land and the said Alka Shroff sold away the said land to the petitioner and the petitioner purchased the same under two registered sale-deeds dated 03.06.2021. It is stated that the sa
The court held that property ownership disputes must be resolved in civil courts rather than through writ proceedings when title questions are contested.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
