SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 373

CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Sanapala Taviti Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Vaddi Narendra Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri Jakkamsetti Saraschandra Babu,

ORDER :

Challenging the impugned orders dated 14.03.2022 passed in Crl.M.P.Nos.21, 22 and 23 of 2022 in Criminal Appeal Nos.60, 61 and 62 of 2022 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Bhimavaram, respectively, whereby while suspending the execution of sentence of imprisonment imposed against the petitioner, the appellate Court has ordered the revision petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation amount in terms of Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, the “N.I. Act”), these Criminal Revision Cases are preferred by the revision petitioner.

2) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the 2nd respondent State.

3) The revision petitioner is the accused in three separate Calendar Cases in C.C.Nos.894, 888 and 889 of 2017 on the file of the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bhimavaram. The said criminal cases are filed against him by the 1st respondent complainants in these three Criminal Revision Cases under Section 138 of the N.I. Act on the ground that the cheques that were issued by him for discharge of legally enforceable debt or liability were dishonoured. The revision petitioner was pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top