RAVI NATH TILHARI
M. Deenaviolet – Appellant
Versus
Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan, Rep. by its State Project Director, Vijayawada – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.
1. Heard Sri Peeta Raman, learned counsel representing Smt S. Priyanka, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri C.B. Adarsh Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri K.V. Raghu Veer, learned standing counsel for the respondents 1 and 2.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:
(i) Calling for the records of the proceedings dated 19.07.2019 and 20.07.2019 of the respondents 1 and 2 respectively also declare the action of the 1st respondent in instructing the 2nd respondent to terminate petitioner's contract as Special Officer vide Rc. No. 47/APSSA/KGBV/2019, dated 19.07.2019 and also the consequential action of the 2nd respondent in terminating petitione's contract as Special Officer vide Rc. No. 667/APSSA/KGBVs/A2/2019, dated 20.07.2019 in furtherance of 1st respondent proceedings dt.19.07.2019 and further the action of the 2nd respondent in directing the 3rd respondent to provide fresh appointment to petitioner as Contract Residential Teacher instead of reinstating her as Special Officer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.