Back
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Pothunuri Srikanth S/o Venkateswararao – Appellant
Versus
Pothunuri Srikumar S/o Venkateswararao – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Plaintiff in the suit filed the above revision against the order dated 11.07.2022 in I.A. No. 140 of 2022 in O.S. No. 12 of 2008 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Srungavarpukota.
2. Plaintiff filed the suit O.S. No. 12 of 2008 against the defendants seeking perpetual injunction. In support of case of plaintiff, he filed Exs.A-1 to A-6, which includes tax receipts dated 23.03.2004 and 02.11.2007. By virtue of orders in C.R.P. No. 5367 of 2018, PW-1 was recalled and Exs.A-7 to A-9 were marked. PWs. 1 to 3 were examined on behalf of plaintiff.
3. Plaintiff filed I.A. No. 140 of 2022 under Rule 129 of Andhra Pradesh Civil Rules of Practice to issue summons to the Executive Officer, Gram Panchayat, S. Kota to cause production of house tax demand register of Gram Panchayat relating to Assessment No. 1622 and 1623 for the years 2008 to 2013.
4. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it was contended inter-alia that suit house originally belonged to Pasi Seetha; that during her lifetime, she executed a Will dated 15.05.2007 and she died on 13.08.2007; that after her death, the local authorities carried out mutation incorporating the name of plaintiff in the place of P
Public documents can be produced in evidence through certified copies, and summoning public officials to produce the original documents is not necessary unless the Court considers it necessary or is ....
The necessity of summoning material evidence, such as the Tahsildar and the evidence of the Tahsildar, in deciding the title of the parties.
Summoning of Government Official – In each case, on examination of facts and circumstances, in light of contentions raised, decision is to be taken whether it is required to summon a government offic....
Compliance with mandatory requirements for summoning documents from a public officer and the limitations of Order XVI, Rules 1 and 5 of the CPC.
Summoning public officers under Order XVI, Rule 1 of CPC cannot be invoked by private parties without adducing proper and relevant evidence to prove their case.
It is well settled principle that in case ‘sufficient cause’ is shown for filing the documents at the hearing of the suit and/or at the end of the trial, such cause shown should receive a liberal con....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
