B. S. BHANUMATHI
Ayala Thavitidu – Appellant
Versus
AngirekulaVenkata Prasad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.S. BHANUMATHI, J.
1. This appeal, under Section 96 CPC, is preferred against the judgment and decree, dated 30.09.2016, passed in O.S. No. 469 of 2014 on the file of the Court of XII Additional District Judge, at Visakhapatnam, whereby the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff seeking specific performance of agreement of sale, dated 16.03.2013, or in the alternative, for refund of advance sale consideration of Rs. 2,80,000/- with interest and costs, was decreed.
2. Heard Sri N. Subba Rao, learned counsel for the appellant/defendant and Sri D. Ravishankar Rao, learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff. The parties shall be referred as the plaintiff and defendant hereinafter.
3. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is as follows:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.