SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 815

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.MARIA CLETE
Kesavaraman, S/o. Ramaiya – Appellant
Versus
Narayanan (died) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.R.Rajarajan
For the Respondents: M/s.V.Srimathi

Table of Content
1. factual background of the plaintiff's case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. plaintiff's arguments and claims on appeal. (Para 8 , 10)
3. court's analysis of readiness and willingness. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. ratio decidendi regarding advance refund and specific performance. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. conclusion and order on the appeal. (Para 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT :

This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 29.03.2019 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Puducherry, in O.S. No. 73 of 2007.

3. Brief facts of the plaintiff’s case: The first defendant (since deceased) was the owner of the suit property. On 18.08.2004, the plaintiff entered into a registered agreement of sale with the first defendant, in which the re-survey number and extent were described as 110/3 and 2240 sq. ft. respectively. On the same date, the earlier agreement of sale dated 19.11.2001 executed by the first defendant in favour of one S. Ravi was cancelled.

5. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant failed to hand over the original title deeds as agreed and that the documents were delivered only in June 2006, after considerable delay. On examining the documents, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top