SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 490

BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
D. Sreenivasa Reddy, Kurnool Dist – Appellant
Versus
Muttumula Rajeswar Reddy, Kurnool Dist – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M R S SRINIVAS
For the Respondent: O. MANOHER REDDY, K. SURYANARAYANA

ORDER :

These Civil Revision Petitions arise out of similar orders passed by learned III Additional District Judge, Nandyal, in interlocutory applications filed by proposed parties under Order I Rule 10 of Civil Procedure Code (in short ‘CPC’) on the same day in different similar suits. Since the question of law and issues, which arise to be dealt with in all these Civil Revision Petitions is similar and the matters are distinct only in their respective facts and events, all these revision petitions are being disposed of by common order.

2. All these Civil Revision Petitions are filed by the petitioners under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the orders passed by learned III Additional District Judge, Kurnool, at Nandyal, in interlocutory applications filed in ten original suits by different parties, dated 20.10.2017 wherein learned trial Judge allowed the petitions filed by proposed parties under Order I Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151 CPC and permitted them to come on record as defendants in the suits.

3. For better understanding of the case, following tabler form i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top