BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
D. Sreenivasa Reddy, Kurnool Dist – Appellant
Versus
Muttumula Rajeswar Reddy, Kurnool Dist – Respondent
ORDER :
These Civil Revision Petitions arise out of similar orders passed by learned III Additional District Judge, Nandyal, in interlocutory applications filed by proposed parties under Order I Rule 10 of Civil Procedure Code (in short ‘CPC’) on the same day in different similar suits. Since the question of law and issues, which arise to be dealt with in all these Civil Revision Petitions is similar and the matters are distinct only in their respective facts and events, all these revision petitions are being disposed of by common order.
2. All these Civil Revision Petitions are filed by the petitioners under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the orders passed by learned III Additional District Judge, Kurnool, at Nandyal, in interlocutory applications filed in ten original suits by different parties, dated 20.10.2017 wherein learned trial Judge allowed the petitions filed by proposed parties under Order I Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151 CPC and permitted them to come on record as defendants in the suits.
3. For better understanding of the case, following tabler form i
Areti Maramma Vs. State Bank of India, Secunderabad and others
Allokam Peddabbayya and another Vs. Allahabad Bank and Others
Habeeb Khan and Others – Petitioners Vs. Valasula Devi and Others – Respondents
P.Govinda Reddy Vs. Golla Obulamma
Soly Pestonji Majoo And Others – Appellants Vs. Gangadhar Khomka – Respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.