IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
Shaik Dilshad – Appellant
Versus
The Superintending Engineer – Respondent
Writ Petition (AT) No. 255 of 2021
Decided On : 01-12-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Empowers all the High Courts of India to issue the writ - Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for relief –Held, Court observed that Government issued, it was mentioned that where service book itself is lost or is not traceable, in such cases once date of appointment is established by independent direct evidence and affidavit given by employee in respect of his service may be accepted along with such collateral evidence as may be produced by him - Further, Government also amended Appendix to A.P. Revised Pension Rules by adding to effect that in cases where service register itself is lost or is not traceable, once date of appointment is established with reference to direct independent evidence, and affidavit given by employee in respect of his service duly supported by collateral evidence of contemporary employee, shall be accepted - Court further observed that admittedly as petitioner has suffering with severe financial crisis and eaking livelihood with meager income derived from doing tailoring and as respondent authorities have dragging matter for years for no fault of her, to which, petitioner is entitled for relief as sought for –Ordered Accordingly.
ORDER :
1. This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
2. Brief facts of the case are that the husband of the petitioner by name Sri Shaik Shanawaz was appointed as Mechanic of Bore well and while he was in service expired on 31.10.2003. He has two wives. The petitioner is the second wife. It is the case of the petitioner that the pensionary benefits of her late husband have not been sanctioned for several years due to disputes between the two wives and finally the disputes have been settled before the Lok Adalat, Putur in PLP No. 14 of 2013. To that effect, the petitioner is accepted to receive the family pension and leave the death benefits and any other amount to the first wife i.e. Smt Noorjahan. It is further stated that the petitioner made several representations to the respondents No. 1 and 2 including the District Collector, Chittoor to settle the family pension. However, the pension of the deceased has not been settled so far under the guise of correspondence between the respondents, which is illegal and arbitrary. Hence, the present writ petition.
3. Counter affidavit has been filed by the 2nd respondent denying all the allegations made in the petition and submits that Sri S. Shanwaz, Pump Mechanic was expired on 31.10.2003. As per the documents produced, he had two wives namely the first wife Smt S. Noorjahan and the second wife Smt S. Dilshad, who is the petitioner herein and both wives of the individual have compromised and a joint agreement was submitted for settlement for death benefits. It is further stated that compassionate appointment was given to the son of the deceased employee as Attender i.e. S/o S. Noorjahan, first wife of the deceased employee and as per the minimum pay Rs. 1875/- family proposals prepared in the name of Smt S. Dilshad, second wife of the deceased employee and submitted to the District Audit Officer, Chittoor. But the family pension has not been sanctioned and returned the above proposal as per Government Circular Memo No. 36840-A/329/A2/Pen.I/93 Fin. and Plg. Department, dated 11.09.1996 since the second wife is not entitled for family pension.
It is further stated that the second wife of late Sri S.Shanwaz has made representations to the District Collector, Chittoor requesting to settle the family pension. As per the instructions of the District Collector, Chittoor the Superintending Engineer, RWS&S Circle, Chittoor has issued instructions to the Executive Engineer, vide Memo No. C4/WC/Estt/2008-09, dated 30.01.2012. As per the instructions of the Superintending Engineer, Chittoor, the E.E, RWS&S Division, Tirupati has put up the letter addressed to all the EEs, PR & RWSS Department in Chittoor district to furnish the attested copies of orders if any with a certificate of service verification for the period which the individual worked in their divisions and send the report to this office to built the Service Register of late Sri S.Shanawaz, Pump Mechanic. Further, the above officers sent the report stating that th
The court affirmed that a legally wedded spouse has a vested right to family pension, which cannot be denied contrary to a binding legal award.
The legally wedded wife of a deceased government servant is entitled to family pension, overriding prior nominations, and a succession certificate is not required for such claims.
The court emphasized the obligation to verify service records, sanction family pension, and settle retirement benefits within a stipulated period, and acknowledged the entitlement of legal heirs to i....
The validity of a marriage under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules and Section 5(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and its impact on entitlement to family pension.
The nominee's entitlement to family pension is upheld, but disputes regarding marital status must be resolved in civil court.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.