SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 742

NINALA JAYASURYA
Byalla Devadas – Appellant
Versus
Sivapuram Rama Yogeswara Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : NAGARAJU NAGURU
For the Respondent: TURAGA SAI SURYA

ORDER :

The instant Civil Revision Petition has been preferred against the order dated 15.11.2021 passed in I.A.No.234 of 2020 in O.S.No.39 of 2019 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Giddalur, Prakasam District.

2. Heard Mr.Nagaraju Naguru, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Turaga Sai Surya, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

3. The petitioner herein is defendant in the above referred suit. The respondent/plaintiff filed the said suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,71,600/- with future interest and costs. The petitioner/defendant filed written statement, inter alia, contending that the suit promissory note is forged document and his signatures were forged. After examination of P.Ws 1 and 2 on behalf of the respondent/plaintiff, the matter was posted for defendant’s evidence on 25.07.2019. At that stage, the petitioner filed I.A.No.234 of 2020 under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 to send Ex.A.1 promissory note to the handwriting expert by receiving specimen writings in the four promissory notes which are annexed to the said application and to receive his specimen signatures in the open Court along with the vakalatnama and written statement f


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top