Gandey Perraju vs Datla Veerabhadra Raju

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(AP) 301

BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
Gandey Perraju – Appellant
Versus
Datla Veerabhadra Raju – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M. V. S. Suresh Kumar.
For the Respondent: E. V. V. S. Ravi Kumar.

JUDGMENT :

1. The defendant Nos.1 to 3 in O.S.No.38 of 1985 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Peddapuram are the appellants, the respondent Nos.1 to 3 are the plaintiffs in the suit. The respondent Nos.4 to 6 are the legal representatives of the deceased-3rd plaintiff.

2. The appellants and the respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein after referred to as plaintiffs and defendants as arrayed before the trial Court.

3. The plaintiffs instituted the suit against the defendant Nos.1 to 3, seeking relief of partition of the plaint schedule properties into two equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiffs. After the death of the 3rd plaintiff, her legal representatives were added as defendant Nos.4 to 6 and claimed the relief that the plaint schedule properties be divide into two equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 and the defendant Nos.4 to 6, and for possession and also compensation of Rs.3,000/- for the years 1981 to 1985, and for costs.

4. It is the contention of the plaintiffs that the plaint ‘A’ schedule property was purchased by late Buddharaju Butchiraju, son of Veeraraghava Raju and his sister, late Subbayamma @ Subhadrayamma, wife of the 1st plaint