SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 336

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A.V. RAVINDRA BABU, J.
The State of A.P., Rep. by its SPL PP Hyd. - Petitioner
Versus
Sri Juthiga Murali Krishna & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 1016 of 2007
Decided On : 23-02-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: A. Gayatri Reddy.
For the Respondent: Turaga Sai Surya.

Headnote:

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2),19 and 20 - Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 - Sections 248(1), 313 and 207 - Indian Evidence Act - Section 25 - Demanded bribe - Appeal against acquittal - Documents and required Government challan before him and expressed his intention to open a seed shop and requested him to issue a licence to open the said shop, for which A.O.1 demanded him bribe amount doing the official favour - Repeated his demand and on that both directed P.W.1 to come to their office with the bribe amount - P.W.1 was not willing to pay demanded bribe amount, he proceeded to the office of P.W.5 and presented Ex.P.1, who, after observing necessary formalities - Held, Court's view that fact that amount was recovered from physical possession of A.O.1 and A.O.2 is not sufficient to convict A.O.1 and A.O.2 - Foundational facts were not proved by the prosecution, Section 20 of P.C. Act has no application to case on hand - Learned Special Judge looked into defence of A.O.1 and A.O.2 and made observations that A.O.1 and A.O.2 had no time to respond in proper manner after P.W.1 thrust amount because in meantime, A.C.B - Court's view that learned Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, rightly appreciated the evidence on record - Criminal Appeal is dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

This is a Criminal Appeal filed by the State, being represented by the Inspector of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Eluru Range, Eluru, challenging the judgment, dated 13.02.2007 in C.C.No.1 of 2003, on the file of Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada (hereinafter will be referred to as 'Special Judge'), where under the learned Special Judge, found the respondents herein i.e., Accused Officers ('A.O.1 and A.O.2' for short) not guilty of the charges under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ('P.C. Act' in short) and acquitted them under Section 248(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('Cr.P.C.' for short).

2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred as described before the trial Court for the sake of convenience.

3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, according to the charge sheet filed before the Court below is as follows :

    (i) One Sri Katakam Venkata Subba Rao S/o. Suryaranarayana, (P.W.1) is resident of Tanuku, who intended to open a seed shop, on 22.03.2002 went to the office of A.O.1 and produced the relevant documents and required Government challan before him and expressed his intention to open a seed shop and requested him to issue a licence to open the said shop, for which A.O.1 demanded him bribe amount of Rs.5,000/- for doing the official favour and also Rs.1,000/- as bribe on behalf of A.O.2 and further informed him that unless they were bribed, they will not issue the said licence and took P.W.1 to A.O.2 and repeated his demand and on that both directed P.W.1 to come to their office with the bribe amount on 27.03.2002 morning. As P.W.1 was not willing to pay the demanded bribe amount, he proceeded to the office of P.W.5 and presented Ex.P.1, who, after observing necessary formalities, registered the same and investigated into.

(ii) On 27.03.2002 at about 11-50 a.m., both the Accused Officers were successfully trapped by P.W.5 when they further demanded and accepted Rs.5,000/- and Rs.1,000/- respectively from P.W.1 at the office of A.O.2. When S.C. solution test was conducted to their hand fingers, it proved positive so also their inner lining shirt pockets. Then, the Dy.S.P., seized the tainted amount, shirts, washings and the relevant record and examined witnesses and as per his instructions P.W.7 made further investigation and submitted draft final report to the D.G., A.C.B.

(iii) The Government of Andhra Pradesh being the competent authority to remove both A.O.1 and A.O.2 from service, issued G.O.Ms.No.414 and 415 dated 21.10.2002 of Agriculture and Cooperation (Vigilance I) Department. Hence, the charge sheet.

4. The learned Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada, took cognizance of the case under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. After complying necessary formalities under Section 207 of Cr.P.C., the Court below framed charges under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against A.O.1 and A.O.2 and explained the same to them in Telugu, for which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

5. In order to prove the guilt against A.O.1 and A.O.2, on behalf of the prosecution P.W.1 to P.W.7 were examined and Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.16 were marked and further M.O.1 to M.O.17 were marked. After closure of the evidence of the prosecution, A.O.1 and A.O.2 were examined under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. with reference to the incriminating circumstances appearing in the evidence let in, for which they denied the same. A.O.1 stated that in respect of issuing licence for seed shop, he has no role to play and it is exclusively within the jurisdiction of Joint Director of Agriculture, Eluru. A.O.1 was not competent either to receive the application or to process it. He also stated that P.W.1 suddenly thrust some amount in his pocket though he was protested. A.O.2 stated that even he is not a recommending authority for issuing licence for seed shop. He never demanded or accepted an

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top