SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 270

A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
State Of AP – Appellant
Versus
P. Nageswara Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : A GAYATRI REDDY
For the Respondent: BADETI VENKATA RATHNAM

JUDGMENT :

This is a Criminal Appeal filed by the State, being represented by the District Inspector, Krishna, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Vijayawada Range, Vijayawada, through the Standing Counsel-cum- Special Public Prosecutor for ACB Cases, challenging the judgment, dated 20.01.2007 in C.C.No.16 of 2004, on the file of Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada, whereunder the learned Special Judge, found the respondent herein i.e., Accused Officer (“AO” for short) not guilty of the charges under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and acquitted him under Section 248(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“Cr.P.C.” for short).

2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred as described before the trial Court for the sake of convenience.

3. The State, being represented by the District Inspector, Krishna, Vijayawada Range, Vijayawada, filed a charge sheet in Crime No.5/ACB-RCT-VJA/2003 of ACB, Vijayawada Range, Vijayawada under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, alleging in substance, as follows:

    (i) Sri Pallapolu Venkata Nageswara Rao, S/o late Kotaiah, who was working as Assistant Manager, P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top