IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, D.V.S.S. SOMAYAJULU, JJ.
Bojja Dasaratha Rami Reddy, S/o. late Sri Bojja Venkata Reddy and Others - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary (Revenue) and Others - Respondents
W.P. (PIL) Nos.290 of 2020, 216 of 2021 and 55 of 2022
Decided On : 01-02-2023
Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 14, 19 and 21 - Land - AICRP projects - Alienation - It is case of petitioners that land which is sought to be alienated in favour of DME is being used by RARS for developing new varieties of crops which are particularly suited to regional micro climate, lands were donated by farmers in the year and then British Government established SARS in said lands - It is highlighted that RARS is amongst oldest Agricultural Research Stations in country and in due course, it has evolved as the best Research Station in India contributing immensely to increasing productivity of crops - It is presently undertaking six All-India Coordinate Research Projects (AICRPs) funded by Indian Council of Agricultural Research (Central Government) in Cotton, Bengal Gram, Sorghum, Small Millets, Oilseeds, Tobacco apart from supporting five additional AICRP projects - It is also centre for production of source seed (Nucleus Seed) of Bengal Gram, Paddy, Small Millets, Cotton, Jowar etc. to cater to breeder seed needs of entire State - Whether public interest would be served in interfering with impugned transfer of 50 acres of land belonging to RARS, Nandyal to the DME for establishment of Government Medical College - Held, according to the University and the District Collector as well, providing of accommodation for temporary establishment of new Collectorate, Nandyal is only a transit arrangement without there being any element of alienation - Petitioners' contention that alienation has been done without approval of Board of Management, does not arise for determination because it is only a temporary sparing to meet transit arrangement for new Collectorate and buildings have not been alienated to State Government for establishment of Collectorate, Nandyal District, permanently - Present is also a case where building owned by University, RARS, is made available temporarily for establishment of new Collectorate - Nature of public interest involved in present case is similar to one involved in above-referred writ petition, writ appeal and S.L.P - Submission contrary to the same is not acceptable. - writ petitions dismissed
ORDER :
(Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.)
1. W.P. (PIL) No.290 of 2020 has been preferred seeking the following relief:
2. W.P. (PIL) No.216 of 2021 has been preferred seeking the following relief:
a. to declare the resolution No.10186 passed by the respondent No.3, the Board of Management of respondent No.2 during its 299th (Urgent) meeting held on 20.06.2021 to alienate the 50 acres of land belonging to the Regional Agricultural Research Station, Nandyal (“RARS”) in favour of Director of Medical Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh as illegal, ultra vires the Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University Act, 1963 and being in violation of the precautionary principle and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India;
b. to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in seeking the and meant for agricultural research for other purposes as violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
3. W.P. (PIL) No.55 of 2022 has been preferred seeking the following relief:
a. set aside the actions of respondent No.5 in issuing directions vide Rc.No.Dy.S.O/282/2022 dated 14.03.2022 as being arbitrary, illegal, unlawful and violative of the constitutional rights of the farmers of Nandyal region in particular and Rayalaseema region in general granted under Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950;
b. declare that the respondent No.2 does not have the power to grant consent to alienate the University property without the due approval of the Board of Management of respondent No.2’s University and consequently set aside the consent granted vide Lr.No.6160/Rea.II(2)/2022, dated 14.03.2022, to respondent No.4 for the establishment of the collectorate of the proposed district of Nandyal in RARS, Nandyal’s buildings;
c. pass any such other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
4. Since the grounds of challenge in the three writ petitions (public interest litigations) are common and overlapping, they are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order.
W.P. (PIL) No.290 of 2020:
5. In furtherance of the “Nadu Nedu” initiative, the State Government has decided to construct a new Medical College in the Districts which currently do not have a Government Medical College. Since the newly formed District of Nandyal has no Government Medical College, the State Government decided to esta
Bahadursingh Lakhubhai Gohil v. Jagdishbhai
Clariant International Ltd. v. SEBI
Bangalore Medical Trust and ors. V. B.S. Muddappa
State of Punjab and Anr. v.Gurdial Singh and Ors.
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Private Ltd. And Union of India
Manohar Lal (D) by Lrs. v. Ugrasen (D) by Lrs. and Ors.
Purtabpore Co. Ltd v. Cane Commissioner of Bihar and ors.
Anirudhsinhji Karansinghji Jadeja and Anr. V. State of Gujarat
State of Maharashtra v. Mahadeo Deoman Rai alias Kalal and others
Raju S. Jethmalani and others v. State of Maharashtra and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State Government's authority to resume and hand over the land was justified, considering the University's agreement for exchange of land a....
Policy decisions regarding the allocation of public land for essential infrastructure and the functional support of constitutional institutions are not subject to judicial interference unless they ar....
Land acquisition for expansion must consider alternative sites only if they are contiguous to existing facilities, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements.
Land acquisition for expansion must consider alternative sites only if they are contiguous to existing facilities, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements.
The court emphasized the limitations on land allotment to educational institutions under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, and the discretionary power of the State Government i....
The court affirmed that eviction orders must comply with natural justice principles, ruling the eviction notice invalid as it lacked fair prior notice and disregarded existing proposals for land alie....
The court affirmed the authority of the state to make land allocations at concessional rates for public interest educational purposes, emphasizing judicial restraint in reviewing policy decisions.
The court held that disputes over property ownership and title cannot be resolved under Article 226 of the Constitution and must be addressed in civil court.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.