IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A.V.RAVINDRA BABU, J.
Veerapaneni Raj Kumar, Prakasam Dist. – Appellant
Versus
Mandapati Srinivasaraju, Prakasam Dist. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.594 of 2009
Decided on : 03-02-2023
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 374(2), 235(2),388, 207 and 313 Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 354 - Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1)(x) and 3(1)(xi) - Outraged modesty of women - Examination of accused - Accused is resident of village, , West district - He is by caste i.e., a non scheduled caste. LW.2 - Victim is aged 16 years and resident of same village but belongs to Scheduled Caste (Mala) - Held, Appellant that sentence of imprisonment imposed against him - Offence under Section 3(1)(x) of SCs STs Act is punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to five years with fine - Even the offence under Section 3(1)(xi) of the SC ST Act is also punishable with the same - Court is of considered view that ends of justice will meet if sentence of two years Rigorous Imprisonment imposed against the appellant under Section 3(1)(xi) of SCs STs Act is modified to that of one year - Criminal Appeal is allowed in part
JUDGMENT :
This Criminal Appeal, under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C’), is filed by the appellant, who was the accused in SCs & STs Sessions Case No.67 of 2006 on the file of the Court of Special Judge for trial of cases under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, West Godavari, Eluru (for short, ‘the Special Judge’), questioning the judgment therein, dated 08.04.2009, where under the learned Special Judge found the appellant herein guilty of the charges under Sections 3(1)(x) and 3(1)(xi) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, ‘the SCs STs Act’) and accordingly convicted him under Section 235(2) Cr.P.C and, further after questioning him about the quantum of sentence, sentenced him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the SCs STs Act and further sentenced him to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 3(1)(xi) of the SCs STs Act.
2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the trial Court, for the sake of convenience.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, as stated in the charge sheet pertaining to Crime No.16 of 2006 of Kovvur Rural Police Station, is that the accused is resident of Kapavaram village, Kovvur mandal, West Godavari district. He is Kapu by caste i.e., a non scheduled caste. LW.2 – victim is aged 16 years and resident of same village but belongs to Scheduled Caste (Mala). She studied up to 7th class, discontinued her studies and started to go to coolie works. LW.1 – Biyyampalli Lakshmi is her mother. LWs.3 and 4 Sirili Jayamma and Gollapalli Ramu are co-coolies. On 24.02.2006 morning, the victim went to coolie works along with LWs.3 and 4, who also belong to scheduled caste. They attended the coolie works in the lease fields of LW.7 – Duvvapu Muthayya. They had their lunch and they were taking a nap (short sleep) in the shade of a tamarind tree by the side of the fields of Muthayya. At about 02:00 p.m. the accused, Balam Balaji, went there, gagged the mouth of the victim and while lifting her, the victim woke up and raised cries. On hearing the same, the co-coolies woke up and witnessed the occurrence. Then, the accused left the victim, abused them in a filthy language in the name of their caste and went away. In the evening after completion of coolie works while they were returning to their home, accused followed them with a packet of chilli bajjies (food item) and offered to the victim. When she refused, accused threatened her to seduce her at any time. Then, she went and informed the occurrence to her mother. LWs.1 and 2 approached their caste elders and elders called the accused but the accused did not turn up. However, on the advice of elders, they approached the Police. On 25.02.2006 at 09:00 a.m. having received the report from LW.1, LW.11 – B. Peddi Raju, Sub- Inspector of Police, registered the same as a case in Crime No.16 of 2006 under Section 354 IPC and also under Sections 3(1)(x) and 3(1)(xi) of the SCs STs Act. LW.12 - N. Balaji Rao, the Sub- Divisional Police Officer, on receipt of information took the FIR and investigated into. LW.10 – Ch. Rangaiah, Mandal Revenue Officer, issued caste certificate in respect of the victim stating that the victim belongs to Scheduled Caste (Mala). During investigation, the SDPO deleted Section 354 IPC since the ingredients under Section 354 IPC includes Section 3(1)(x) and 3(1)(xi) of the SCs STs Act. On 28.02.2006, LW.12 arrested the accused and sent him for remand. Hence, the charge sheet.
4. The II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kovvur took the case on file and after completing the formalities under
The importance of prompt lodging of FIR in criminal cases and the need for evidence to establish the presence of the public at the time of the offense to satisfy the criteria of 'public view' under S....
Prosecution must prove charges under the SCs & STs Act beyond reasonable doubt; unexplained delay in lodging FIR can undermine case credibility.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for credible evidence to prove charges under the SCs & STs Act. The court emphasized the importance of considering factors such ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on victim testimony, medical evidence, and witness statements to establish guilt, along with the consideration of the absence of delib....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt and the importance of properly appreciating the evidence presented in a case.
The court confirmed the conviction under the SC/ST Act for caste-based assault, emphasizing the weight of corroborative evidence from the injured parties and proper explanation for the delay in filin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.