IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A.V. RAVINDRA BABU, J.
Nandyala Ramananda Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 848 of 2009
Decided On : 29-12-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case and charges (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. evidence presented in court (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. testimony of injured parties (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. witnesses and their support (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. arguments presented by the defense and prosecution (Para 21 , 22) |
| 6. court's evaluation of evidence (Para 28 , 29) |
| 7. final judgment and orders (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
A.V. RAVINDRA BABU, J.
1. Challenge in this Criminal Appeal is to the judgment, dated 16.07.2008 in Special Sessions Case No. 23 of 2008, on the file of Special Sessions Judge for S.Cs & S.Ts (POA) Act, Kadapa (“Special Judge” for short), whereunder the learned Special Judge found the accused guilty of the charges under Section 3(1)(x) of S.Cs & S.Ts (POA) Act, 1989 and Section 323 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (“IPC” for short), convicted him under Section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“Cr.P.C” for short) and after questioning him about the quantum of sentence, sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days for the offence under Section 3(1)(x) of S.Cs & S.Ts (POA) Act, 1989 and further sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days for the offence under Section 323 of IPC.
2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the learned Special Judge for the sake of convenience.
3. The Special Sessions Case arose out of a committal order in P.R.C. No. 2 of 2008, on the file of I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Proddatur.
4. The State, represented by Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Proddatur, filed charge sheet in Crime No. 135 of 2007 alleging as follows:
(ii) On 12.10.2007 LW-6 engaged LW-1 to LW-4 for demolition of old wall in order to construct a new wall. At her instructions, LW-1 to LW-4 started demolishing the wall. Around 12-00 noon when they were attending the said work, the accused went there and grew wild and abused LW-1 to LW-4 in the name of caste as “NEEYAMMA MADIGA GUDDANNI DENGA MADIGA LANJA KODAKALLARA.” So abusing, the accused picked up a spade stick and dealt a blow on the left rib of LW-1, resulting in swelling injury. He also beat LW-2 and LW-3 with a spade stick on their left shoulders and caused swelling injuries. He also beat LW-4 with a stone on his left palm and caused swelling injury. LW-5 and LW-6 witnessed the occurrence and intervened and sent the accused. Later, LW-1 to LW-4 went to Proddatur Rural Police Station and presented a report. LW-10-A.S.I. basing on the report registered FIR and referred LW-1 to LW-4 to Government Hospital, Proddatur. On the instructions of Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, dated 12.10.2007, LW-11-SDPO, Proddatur, took up investigation. He visited the scene of offence, observed the same and prepared rough sketch. LW-7- Dr. K. Annapurnamma, CAS, examined the injured persons and o
The court confirmed the conviction under the SC/ST Act for caste-based assault, emphasizing the weight of corroborative evidence from the injured parties and proper explanation for the delay in filin....
Prosecution must prove charges under the SCs & STs Act beyond reasonable doubt; unexplained delay in lodging FIR can undermine case credibility.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for credible evidence to prove charges under the SCs & STs Act. The court emphasized the importance of considering factors such ....
The importance of prompt lodging of FIR in criminal cases and the need for evidence to establish the presence of the public at the time of the offense to satisfy the criteria of 'public view' under S....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on victim testimony, medical evidence, and witness statements to establish guilt, along with the consideration of the absence of delib....
Convictions under SC & ST (POA) Act must be supported by compelling and consistent evidence of caste-based abuse in public.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of prompt lodging of reports to avoid embellishments and afterthoughts, as well as the need for a proper explanation for any delay i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the prosecution must prove the intention to outrage the modesty of a victim to sustain a charge under Section 3(1)(xi) of S.Cs & S.Ts (POA) Ac....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.