Back
A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
Nandyala Ramananda Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case and charges (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. evidence presented in court (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. testimony of injured parties (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. witnesses and their support (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. arguments presented by the defense and prosecution (Para 21 , 22) |
| 6. court's evaluation of evidence (Para 28 , 29) |
| 7. final judgment and orders (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
A.V. RAVINDRA BABU, J.
1. Challenge in this Criminal Appeal is to the judgment, dated 16.07.2008 in Special Sessions Case No. 23 of 2008, on the file of Special Sessions Judge for S.Cs & S.Ts (POA) Act, Kadapa (“Special Judge” for short), whereunder the learned Special Judge found the accused guilty of the charges under Section 3(1)(x) of S.Cs & S.Ts (POA) Act, 1989 and Section 323 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (“IPC” for short), convicted him under Section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“Cr.P.C” for short) and after questioning him about the quantum of sentence, sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days for the offence under Section 3(1)(x) of S.Cs &
The court confirmed the conviction under the SC/ST Act for caste-based assault, emphasizing the weight of corroborative evidence from the injured parties and proper explanation for the delay in filin....
![Uppara Venkatesulu, S/o. Mulinti Anjinappa, Magecheruvu[V], Anantapur VS State Of A. P. , Rep. By P. P. - 2023 Supreme(AP) 1509](https://supremetoday-s3.b-cdn.net/Andhra_Pradesh_2.png)
Prosecution must prove charges under the SCs & STs Act beyond reasonable doubt; unexplained delay in lodging FIR can undermine case credibility.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for credible evidence to prove charges under the SCs & STs Act. The court emphasized the importance of considering factors such ....
The importance of prompt lodging of FIR in criminal cases and the need for evidence to establish the presence of the public at the time of the offense to satisfy the criteria of 'public view' under S....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on victim testimony, medical evidence, and witness statements to establish guilt, along with the consideration of the absence of delib....
Convictions under SC & ST (POA) Act must be supported by compelling and consistent evidence of caste-based abuse in public.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of prompt lodging of reports to avoid embellishments and afterthoughts, as well as the need for a proper explanation for any delay i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the prosecution must prove the intention to outrage the modesty of a victim to sustain a charge under Section 3(1)(xi) of S.Cs & S.Ts (POA) Ac....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
