IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B. Krishna Mohan, J.
K. Eswar Reddy and Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, and other - Respondents
Writ Petition Nos.19712, 21018, 21023, 21500, 21860, 21862, 21864, 21866 and 30848 of 2022
Decided On : 24-01-2023
Tender - Lease poultry farmers - Petitioners are farmers running poultry farms for last so many years - While so respondent No.2 issued e-procurement notice NIT No.dated for year giving eligibility criteria under para 2.2.2 by allowing consortium of poultry farmers to participate in tenders subject to fulfilling all other eligible conditions with a restriction of the number of farmers in consortium to a maximum of four original poultry farmers which cannot be exceeded to - Para 2.2.3 of the said notice envisages that suppliers, dealers, traders, marketers, third persons and brokers forming joint venture or partnership or doing poultry formation on lease farms or tenant farmer are not eligible to participate in bid - Counsel for petitioners submits that said corrigendum was issued in order to facilitate corporate egg traders at cost of real poultry farmers - Whether they have locus standi to question work order issued in favour of the 5th respondent who actually participated in tender for these routes - Held, Only lease poultry farmers are enabled to participate in bid along with consortium of poultry farmers as provided in condition No.2.2.3(a) and condition no. 2.2.2 respectively of tender notification dated which can't be termed as discriminatory or ultra vires to policies of Government and as well as rules, Government Orders and notifications as referred above - In fact, a fair and transparent opportunity was provided to all interested persons to participate in tender as per conditions of eligibility - Any of members of consortium of poultry farmers is not before this court in these writ petitions and petitioners questioned tender notification have not participated in tender process at any stage and they are not even unsuccessful bidders - Hence, they cannot espouse cause of poultry farmers if any - Since poultry farmers and leased poultry farmers are doing same nature of business/work belonging to homogenous class cannot be excluded by one another in respect of participation and submission of their bids under e-tender notifications when they are made eligible to participate - All these writ petitions are dismissed
ORDER :
W.P.No.19712 of 2022 :
This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent No.2 in issuing the e-procurement notice NIT No.125/2022 dated 15.06.2022 incorporating the condition No.2.2.3 (a).
2. The counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the farmers running poultry farms for the last so many years. While so the respondent No.2 issued e-procurement notice NIT No.125/2022 dated 08.06.2022 for the year 2022-23 giving eligibility criteria under para 2.2.2 by allowing the consortium of poultry farmers to participate in the tenders subject to fulfilling all the other eligible conditions with a restriction of the number of farmers in the consortium to a maximum of four original poultry farmers which cannot be exceeded to. The Para 2.2.3 of the said notice envisages that the suppliers, dealers, traders, marketers, third persons and brokers forming joint venture or partnership or doing poultry formation on lease farms or tenant farmer are not eligible to participate in the bid. The said tender notification was also published in the daily newspapers. Instead of adhering to the said conditions, the respondent No.2 suddenly issued a corrigendum to the said tender notification dated 08.06.2022 by inserting the para 2.2.3(a) enabling the lease poultry farmers also to participate in the bid provided they are properly registered with the registration and stamps department for a period of at least two years till 30.06.2024 subject to fulfilling all the other conditions on par with the poultry farmers. The counsel for the petitioners submits that the said corrigendum was issued in order to facilitate the corporate egg traders at the cost of real poultry farmers. In furtherance of the said action, the respondent No.2 cancelled the earlier tender notification dated 08.06.2022 and issued the impugned tender notification dated 15.06.2022 with the introduction of para 2.2.3(a) as stated above. No sufficient time was also given for submission of the bids pursuant to the impugned tender notification dated 15.06.2022. Hence, the said procurement notice NIT No.125/2022 dated 15.06.2022 is assailed in this writ petition.
3. On the other hand, the learned Government Pleader relying upon the counter affidavit of the respondent No.2 submits that the e-procurement tenders were called for procurement of supply of eggs to all the schools and Anganwadi centers under the scheme of Jagananna Gorumudda and YSR Sampoorna Poshana in the State. The 26 tenders were floated from NIT Nos.107 to 132 i.e., one bid for each district. The tender notification was published in the widely circulated Telugu daily newspapers i.e., Sakshi and Eenadu and in the English newspaper dated 08.06.2022. The schedule of the tender was as follows:
| Sl.No. | Activity | Date/Time |
| 1. | Invitation of Bid (notice inviting tenders) | 08.06.2022-10-00 AM |
| 2. | Last date/time for sale of document | 16.06.2022 17-00 PM |
| 3. | Bid closing date/Time | 16.06.2022-17:30 PM |
| 4. | Pre-bid meeting date/time | 10.06.2022-11-00 AM |
| 5. | Submission of samples On or before | 17.06.2022 at 10.00 AM |
| 6. | Technical evaluation date/time | 17.06.2022 11:00 AM |
| 7. | Declaration of financial bid and reverse tendering | Within 14 days from bid due date |
| 8. | Letter of Award (LOA) | Within 21 days from bid due date or as decided by the government. |
He has specifically denied that the lease poultry farmers are allowed under the impugned tender notification dated 15.06.2022 only in order to facilitate the corporate egg traders and submits that it is far from truth. The leased poultry farmers are also the poultry farmers. The term ‘lease poultry farmer’ itself denotes that they are poultry farmers but not the corporate traders as alleged by the petitioner. Similar to the leased farmer in agricultural sector, leased poultry farmers who ha
Michigan Rubber (India) Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka And Others
Meerut Development Authority Vs. Association Of Management Studies And Another
Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Shahdeo vs. State of Bihar and others reported in (1999) 8 SCC 1
The court held that imposing an experience requirement on manufacturers for government supply contracts, absent from the original tender documents, is arbitrary and unjustified.
Point of law: Tender/Contract – Judicial Review - Equal opportunity granted to all technically qualified bides – No question of violation of fundamental rights.
Point of Law : When some defect is found in the decision-making process, court must exercise its discretionary powers under Article 226 with great caution and should exercise it only in furtherance o....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.