IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J.
Ch.V.Subba Rao, S/o Ramanaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh and another – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos.10177 and 13047 of 2020
Decided on : 15-03-2023
Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Recording & Alteration of Date of Birth) Rules, 1984 - Rule 2 - Alteration changes of date of Birth - Mandamus declaring the inaction and failure of the respondents in not conducting statutory enquiry relating to the petitioner's date of birth in the service register- respondents to effect necessary changes on the Service Register as to the petitioner's date of birth i.e. to alter the petitioner's date of birth in the service register -Held, Though the learned counsel for petitioner would submit that petitioner approached the civil Court and got decree, in view of Rule 2A of the Rules, the decree of a civil Court regarding alteration of date of birth of an employee, does not bind the employer. Petitioner approached the authorities at the fag end of his career and later, approached this Court- Court is of the considered opinion that there are no merits- - Writ Petitions dismissed.
ORDER :
Since the reliefs claimed in both the writ petitions are inter-linked and parties are one and the same, these writ petitions are dealt with jointly and disposed of by a common order.
2. Petitioner filed W.P.No.10177 of 2020 seeking the following relief:
3. W.P.No.13047 of 2020 is filed seeking the following relief:
4. (a) Facts, in brief, are that petitioner joined as Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records on 01.10.1990. At the time of joining into service, the department collected all the certificates relating to education qualification. Petitioner, later noticed that his date of birth was not entered in the service register and he submitted a written representation to the 2nd respondent on 10.06.1996 to record his date of birth in accordance with the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Recording & Alteration of Date of Birth) Rules, 1984 (for short “the Rules”). Petitioner also submitted extract of birth register issued by the concerned authority. 2nd respondent vide Memo No.E1/4847/96 dated 28.08.1997 intimated that his date of birth as 01.07.1960, basing on secondary school certificate of the petitioner. 2nd Respondent neither conducted enquiry nor afforded an opportunity to the petitioner to submit his explanation under Rule 2 (3) of the Rules.
(b) Aggrieved by the proceedings of 2nd respondent recording his date of birth as 01.07.1960, petitioner made a representation to the 1st respondent, who in turn issued Memo No.91795/SS.2/97-4 dated 22.06.1998 directing the 2nd respondent to conduct a fresh enquiry in accordance with the procedure laid down under Rule 2 (3) of the Rules. In spite of petitioner’s approaching 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry relating to date of birth, no enquiry was conducted.
(c) The date of birth certificate issued by the Registrar of Birth & Deaths does not contain the name of petitioner and further the in secondary school certificate the date of birth was mentioned as 01.07.1960, petitioner filed suit O.S.No.82 of 2002 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Podili. Suit was decreed on 27.09.2004. Petitioner submitted written representation dated 11.06.2018 to conduct enquiry regarding his date of birth and to change the date of birth in service register. As per the date of birth mentioned in the service register, petitioner would be superannuated by 30.06.2020.
(d) Initially, petitioner filed W.P.No.10177 of 2020 seeking the relief referred supra and the matter was liste
N.Naga Raju vs. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh
State of Tamil Nadu v. T.V. Venugopalan
Sundilla Lingaiah Vs. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. and Ors.
Requests for correction of date of birth in service records made at the end of service are not sustainable unless made within prescribed time limits and with clear evidence of error.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for irrefutable proof and timely requests for correction of date of birth in service records, as well as the limitations on seeking....
Applications for correction of date of birth in service records must be timely; delay can invalidate claims, even with evidence.
Requests for correction of recorded date of birth at the end of service are usually unsustainable due to delay and must meet strict procedural requirements.
Requests for changing recorded dates of birth in government service records cannot be entertained at the fag end of service without compelling evidence and adherence to procedural regulations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.