ORDER :

1. The plaintiff in the suit filed this civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India questioning the correctness of order dated 24.08.2019 of learned Family Court-cum-XII Additional District Court, Guntur in I.A.No.755 of 2019 in O.S.No.39 of 2011.

2. In this revision, the point raised and argued is that the learned trial Court failed to exercise jurisdiction vested in it in the manner that is expected to be exercised by law and failed to consider the application appropriately and went beyond the legal requirement and considered about merits of the matter and therefore, the order shall be upset.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent Nos.12, 16 and 19 made their submissions and other respondents did not appear and contest.

4. Therefore, the question that falls for consideration is :

“Whether the learned trial Court committed error in exercising its jurisdiction and passed an infirm order requiring interference?

5. The controversy is about refusal of the trial Court in permitting the plaintiff to have the plaint amended in terms of Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C. Having lost the prayer, the plaintiff has come up with this revision.

6.