SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3238

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Durai – Appellant
Versus
Pattammal – Respondent


For the Petitioners:E. Prabu for S. Mohan, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 to R3, R. Krishnaswamy, Caveator.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal Order dated 19.09.2022 passed in I.A.No.1/2021 in O.S.No.88/2010 by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Ponneri.)

1. The Defendants 1 to 3 in O.S.No.88/2010 had filed this Revision Petition seeking to set aside the Order passed by the learned Additional Sub Judge, Ponneri in dismissing the Petition in I.A.No.1/2021 in O.S.No.88/2010, by an Order dated 19.09.2022. The Plaintiffs are mother and sisters of the Defendants. They had filed the Suit for partition.

2. The learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioners invited the attention of this Court to the averments in the Plaint and the Scheduled property in the Plaint in O.S.No.213/2008. The properties were situated in Verkadu Village, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur District which is described in the Scheduled property under serial Nos.1 to 8 and also in Applavaram Village, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur District which are described in Serial Nos.1 to 10 separately and the properties in Old Gummidipoondi Village which are described in Serial Nos.1 to 4 separately. The Suit was filed for partition. In the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top