SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 27

A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
Venigandla Rajyalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Venigandla Venkata Ramanjaneyulu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : T S ANIRUDH REDDY

ORDER :

This Criminal Revision Case, under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C’), came to be filed by the petitioner namely Venigandla Rajyalakshmi, who was the de-facto complainant and examined as prosecution witness No.1 (PW.1) in C.C. No.28 of 2007, on the file of the Court of Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ponnur (for short, ‘the learned Magistrate’), against the judgment, dated 01.04.2009, where under the learned Magistrate found the first respondent/sole accused, not guilty of for the offence under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘the IPC’) and acquitted him under Section 248 (1) of the Cr.P.C.

2. The parties to this Criminal Revision Case will hereinafter be referred to as described before the trial Court, for the sake of convenience.

3. The State, represented by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Ponnur Town Station, filed charge sheet in Crime No.8 of 2007 for the offences under Sections 498-A and 341 of IPC. The case of the prosecution, before the Court below, as per the averments in the charge sheet filed by the Police, is as follows:

The marriage of the de-facto complainant i.e., LW.1- Venigandla Rajyalaksh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top