Back
M. NIRMAL KUMAR
Murugan – Appellant
Versus
State by The Station House Officer, Puducherry – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(PRAYER : Criminal Revision petition filed under Sections 397 r/w.401 Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the judgment dated 10.09.2014 made in C.A.No.01 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Puducherry, which was conforming the judgment dated 27.11.2013 made in C.C.No.200 of 2010 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry and acquit the petitioner by allowing this revision.)
1. The petitioner/Accused No.1 in C.C.No.200/2010, who was convicted by the trial Court for the offence under Section 498-A and sentenced to undergo 6 months Rigorous Imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and for the offence under Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, sentenced to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment, by judgment dated 27.11.2013. The sentences are directed to run concurrently. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Puducherry in Crl.A.No.1 of 2014. The Lower Appellate Court dismissed the appeal confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court, against which, the present revision.
2. The gist of the case is that the de-facto complainant/P.W.1 married the petitioner on 16.06.20
Credibility of witness testimony and evidence is crucial in determining the outcome of a criminal case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for specific details and corroborative evidence to sustain a conviction under Section 498(A) IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition....
Consent given by the victim negates the elements of cheating under IPC Section 420 if not induced by false promise.
The judgment reinforces the legal principle that evidence of cruelty and dowry demands, as defined under IPC Section 498A and the Dowry Prohibition Act, is sufficient for conviction, and that subsequ....
Dowry as a quid pro quo for marriage is prohibited and not giving of traditional presents to bride or bridegroom by friends and relatives.
Offence of Cruelty - Conviction affirmed - Scope of revisional jurisdiction this court is not inclined to interfere with impugned judgment of conviction of petitioner under section 498(A) of Indian P....
The court affirmed the principle of proportionality in sentencing, emphasizing that evidence must clearly substantiate claims of domestic abuse and dowry demands.
Demand of dowry – Conviction set aside – Suit restitution of conjugal rights decreed, but the wife/complainant has not complied that decree
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
