JUDGMENT :

Defendant in the suit filed the above second appeal aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 21.02.2022 in A.S.No.114 of 2019 on the file of XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Narasaraopeta, confirming the judgment and decree dated 10.04.2019 in O.S.No.32 of 2013 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Vinukonda.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties to this judgment are referred to as per their array in the plaint.

3. Plaintiff filed suit O.S.No.32 of 2013 seeking possession of plaint schedule property by ejecting the defendant; direct the defendant to remove the superstructure lying in the plaint schedule or in case if the defendant failed to remove the same, to permit the plaintiff to remove the structures; recovery of damages at Rs.5,434/- for use and occupation from 24.06.2010 to 12.02.2013 and for enhancement of damages etc.

4. Plaintiff, an Ashramam represented by the President of its Trust Board, filed the above suit. In the plaint it was contended that Ashramam is the owner of plaint schedule site. The defendant’s father Donthu Ranga Rao initially took the schedule site on lease in March, 1997 from the then Mathadipathi of plaintiff Sri Chevuri Satyanar