BATTU DEVANAND
Boya Dasthagiramma – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Ms. G. Sindhu, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies and perused the record.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as a fair price shop dealer of Shop No. 1304034 of Kanakaveedu Village, Nandavaram Mandal, Kurnool District, by the 3rd respondent on 07.05.2015. She is discharging her duties as fair price shop dealer without any complaints and she is distributing essential commodities to the card holders attached to her shop.
3. Learned counsel further submits that basing on the report of the 4th respondent to take disciplinary action against the petitioner, the 3rd respondent issued proceedings in Rc. M. 5980/2021, dated 30.12.2021, suspending the authorization of the petitioner pending enquiry on certain allegations. Thereafter enquiry is not conducted and the petitioner was kept under suspension pending enquiry. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that suspending the authorization of the petitioner pending enquiry for more than 90 days is illegal and against to the law declared by this Court and as such, the 3rd respondent has to revoke the suspension order and to rest
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.