B. S. BHANUMATHI
B. Venkata Lakshmi @ Avula Venkatalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
The Writ Petition is filed seeking the following prayer:
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the 1st respondent.
3. The case of the petitioner is briefly as follows:
a. The petitioner was appointed as a fair shop dealer on permanent basis for Shop No. 111512, Vivek Nagar, Proddatur Mandal, by the 4th respondent on 03.02.2009, vide proceedin
B. Manjula Vs. District Collector, Civil Supplies, Kurnool and others
Pidikiti Sailaja Vs. State of A.P.
C.Durga Srinivas Rao and others Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others
Indefinite suspension of a fair price shop dealer without a concluded inquiry violates natural justice and statutory provisions.
Suspension of dealership authorization under the Essential Commodities Act requires a fair enquiry and substantiation of charges by the appointing authority.
The period of suspension of a fair price shop dealer pending enquiry cannot exceed 90 days. If the enquiry is not completed within 90 days, the suspension order must be revoked and the authorization ....
A suspension order without timely enquiry is arbitrary and violates principles of natural justice.
Suspension of fair price shop authorization requires adherence to principles of natural justice, including proper enquiry and reasoned decisions.
since the suspension was during pendency of the inquiry initiated against the petitioner and a final order was passed, the petition became infructuous and this Court need not advert to various conten....
Absence of reasoning as to the mandatory requirement of provision which conferred jurisdiction on the quasi judicial authority or a Court or administrative authority is mandatory. In the absence of r....
The disciplinary authority must conduct a fair enquiry and consider the dealer's explanation before suspending authorization, in compliance with the relevant provisions of the Control Order, 2018.
Point of Law : Cancellation of petitioner’s authorization on the ground that charge No.5 was proved, which is grave in nature, could not find merit consideration as per Clause 24 of the Control Order....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.