SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1163

R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Federation of Minor Minerals Industry – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The 1st petitioner is the Federation of Minor Minerals Industry and the 2nd petitioner, which is a member of the 1st petitioner sought grant of a mining lease for granite, over 3 Hectares of land in Sy.No.1 of Addukouda Village, Tekkali Mandal, Srikakulam District.

2. The Central Government exercising its power under Sec. 18 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred as "MMDR Act,1957") had framed the Granite Conservation and Development Rules, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Granite Rules) which set out the rules for Conservation, Systematic and Scientific Exploitation of Granite Resources in India. All licenses and leases, relating to exploitation of granite resources, are required to be issued in accordance with these rules. The Government of Andhra Pradesh had also issued, under Sec. 15 of the MMDR Act, 1957, the Andhra Pradesh Mining Mineral Concession Rues, 1996 (hereinafter referred as the "Minor Mineral concession Rules, 1996") under G.O.Ms.No.1172 dtd. 4/9/1967. These rules have been amended from time to time including the amendment by G.O.Ms.No.13, Industries & Commerce (Mines-III), dtd. 14/3/2022 and G.O.Ms.No.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top