SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.R.Shriram, C.J., Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
R.Thamaraiselvan- Petitioner
Versus
Government of India Rep. by Joint Secretary to Government Ministry of Mines Shastri Bhawan Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road New Delhi and ors. – Respondents
W.P.Nos.4110, 4772 of 2021, 13811 & 18317 of 2020 & W.M.P.Nos.4686, 4688, 4690, 5384, 5387, 5389 of 2021; 17169, 17172, 17315, 22694, 22695, 22696 of 2020; 11641, 11642, 15862 & 15864 of 2024
Decided On : 22-11-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.C.T.Mohan Senior Counsel, For Ms.M.Geetha Thamaraiselvan
For the Respondent:Dr.D.Simon, Mr.P.S.Raman, Advocate General, Assisted by, Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu, Additional Government Pleader, Mr.K.Srinivasamurthy, W.P.No.4772 of 2021, Mr.K.Ramanamoorthy, Central Government Counsel, Mr.P.S.Raman, Advocate General, Assisted by Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu, Additional Government Pleader, Mr.K.Srinivasamurthy, Mr.K.Subburanga Bharathi, Central Govt. Standing Counsel,, Mr.P.S.Raman, Advocate General, Assisted by Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu, Additional Government Pleader, Mr.P.R.Raman, Senior Counsel, For Mr.Ashwin Premsundar, Mr.V.Raghavachari, Senior Counsel, for Mr.S.Tamil Selvan, Mr.Abudu Kumar Rajarathnam, Senior Counsel, For Mr.S.Ashok Kumar, Mr.K.Subburanga Bharathi, Central Govt. Standing Counsel, Mr.P.S.Raman, Advocate General, Assisted by, Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu, Additional Government Pleader, Mr.Srinath Sridevan, Senior Counsel, for Mr.P.S.Prabu

The State Government has the authority to regulate quarry leases under the MMDR Act, and notifications issued for such leases were valid despite the petitioner's claims.

Headnote:(A) Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Section 3(e) - Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 - Petitions challenging Tender-cum-Auction Notifications for quarry leases in government lands - Petitioner contended that notifications were issued without following guidelines from the Ministry of Mines - Court found no merit in the petitions, affirming that the State Government has the authority to frame rules for granting leases and that the notifications were valid. (Paras 9, 13, 14)

(B) Public Interest Litigation - The court emphasized the need for genuine public interest in PILs and discouraged frivolous petitions, directing the petitioner to pay costs due to the adverse impact on private respondents. (Paras 15, 16)

ORDER :

K.R.Shriram, C.J.,

Prayer : Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

(i) in W.P.No.4110 of 2021 – a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned Tender-cum-Auction Notification in Roc.No.1113/2020 (Mines) dated 01.02.2021 published in English Daily 'Indian Express” dated 04.02.2021 and Tamil Daily “Dhina Mani” dated 04.02.2021 by the 3rd respondent herein, quash the same as unsustainable in law and consequently direct the respondents herein to strictly follow the statutory order passed by the 1st respondent vide his order No.16/4/2020-M.VI dated 03.06.2020 and the relevant rules in force in the matter of grant of quarry lease for quarrying granites in Government lands at Krishnagiri District;

(ii) in W.P.No.4772 of 2021 - a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned Tender-cum-Auction Notification in Roc.No.410/2016 (Mines) dated 18.01.2021 published in English Daily “The Hindu” dated 21.01.2021 and Tamil Daily “Dhina Mani” dated 21.01.2021 by the 3rd respondent herein, quash the same as unsustainable in law and consequently, direct the respondents herein tostrictly follow the statutory order passed by the 1 st respondent vide his order No.16/4/2020-M.VI dated 03.06.2020 and the relevant Rules in force in the matter of grant of quarry lease for quarrying granites in Government lands at Dharmapuri District;

(iii) in W.P.No.18311 of 2020 – a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent relating to Notification Roc.No.410/2016 (Mines) dated 08.09.2020 published in the English Daily 'The Hindu' and Tamil Daily “Dhinamani” dated 10.09.2020, quash the same as without jurisdiction and to issue consequential directions to the respondents to scrupulously implement the guidelines issued by the 1 st respondent, Government of India, Ministry of Mines, New Delhi in their Order No.16/4/2020 M-VI dated 03.06.2020 and then initiate steps afresh to grant quarrying lease of granite as per law; and

(iv) in W.P.No.18317 of 2020 - a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned tender cum auction notification issued by 4th respondent in his Rc.No.90/2017/Mines dated 09.10.2020, published in Tamil daily namely Daily Thanthi dated 17. 10.2020 in English daily namely The Hindu dated 17.10.2020 and subsequent notification dated 28.10.2020 postponing the tender cum auction on 06.11.2020 and 07.11.2020 respectively issued and published in Daily Thanthi dated 30.10.2020 by the 4th respondent herein, quash the same as unsustainable and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 6 herein to strictly follow the statutory order passed by the 1 st respondent vide his order No.16/4/2020-M.VI dated 03.06.2020 and the relevant Rules in force in the matter of grant of quarry lease for quarrying granites from the black and colour granite areas situated in government lands at Krishnagiri District.

Petitioner is an advocate by profession, having more than 32 years of standing and practising at Madras High Court. Petitioner was also a Member of Parliament in the year 2009 from Dharmapuri Lok Sabha Constituency and served as such till May, 2014. Petitioner claims to be a social activist and has filed the public interest litigation, W.P.No.4772 of 2021, against the grant of quarry lease for black granites situated in government lands in Dharmapuri District.

2. According to petitioner, having seen the notification dated 18.01.2021 published in English daily 'The Hindu' in its edition dated 21.01.2021 and Tamil daily 'Dhina Mani' in its edition dated 21.01.2021, he has filed this petition.

3. Petitioner's case is very narrow. According to petitioner, respondent No.3, District Collector, has issued a notification in the newspapers, as mentioned earlier, inviting tenders for 17 areas for quarry lease under Rule 8-A of the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959, without following the directions give

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top