SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 977

CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Kadiyala Simhachalam – Appellant
Versus
E State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Challa Dhanamjaya, Advocate, Dheera Kanishka, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. This Writ Petition for a mandamus is filed to declare the notice issued under Sec. 91 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner to produce the original sale agreement of the year 1998 before the Police in connection with investigation in a case registered in Crime No.434 of 2021 of Prakash Nagar Police Station, Rajahmahendravaram Urban, as illegal and without jurisdiction and consequently, prayed to quash the said notice, dtd. 17/10/2021.

2. Factual matrix of the Writ Petition may be stated as follows:-

    (a) The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.434 of 2021 of Prakash Nagar Police Station, Rajahmahendravaram Urban. A person by name Gurrala Venkata Krishna Rao lodged a report with the Station House Officer of Prakash Nagar Police Station, Rajahmahendravaram Urban, stating that Sri Naidu Veera Venkata Satya Pratap is the original owner of the vacant site in an extent of 311.11 sq. yards covered by Plot No.B-2, situate in Prakash Nagar-2, Near AKC College of Rajamahendravaram. It is stated that he purchased the said land in the year 1994 and, thereafter, left for America. He came to Rajamahendravaram about 3 months back and executed a General Power of Attorney in favour of the complaina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top