ORDER :

Kunuru Lakshman, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondents.

2. The only grievance of the writ petitioner in the present writ petition is the action of respondent No.4 in directing him to furnish the information vide Notice No. 27/OW/ACP/WCO Team VIII/CCS/2021, dated 09.03.2021 issued under Section - 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') is illegal.

3. Vide the aforesaid notice, respondent No. 4 directed the petitioner - accused No. 1 to produce the following information:

"1. Whether you have kept documents of mortgaged house property with you/ with your agents as security or not.

2. If you kept house property documents as security whether you have returned the documents at the time of revoking/ cancelling the mortgage deed.

3. If you kept the documents as security and not returned to the owner Sri Madhusudana Rao, where are there."

4. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No. 4 is not having power to call for any incriminating material from the accused under Section - 91 of Cr.P.C. In support of the same, he has placed reliance on the princi