SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 928

NINALA JAYASURYA
Maata Rani – Appellant
Versus
Jangala Anil Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.Prabhakara Rao, Advocate, Somisetty Ganesh Babu, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ninala Jayasurya, J. - Heard Mr.P.Prabhakara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the 2nd respondent-State and Mr.Somisetty Ganesh Babu for the 1st respondent/de facto complainant.

2. The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the F.I.R.No.245 of 2020 on the file of the Nagarjuna Sagar Police Station, Guntur District, which is registered against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Ss. 379 and 420 of IPC. The 1st respondent lodged the said complaint, inter alia, stating that he filed a complaint on 4/8/2020 in the Nagarjuna Sagar Police Station that his Pass Book and Blank Cheques of State Bank of India, Brodipet, Guntur were missing, and that he obtained a certificate to that effect. Further, on receipt of a legal notice dtd. 10/12/2020, wherein it was intimated that a cheque was bounced and on verification of the cheque number, he noticed that it is one of the missing cheques. It is also alleged in the legal notice sent on behalf of the petitioner herein that he had obtained a loan of Rs.5, 00, 000.00 from the petitioner in the presence of one Istavath Hanuma Naik and Desavath Lakshma Naik and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top