JUDGMENT

Subba Reddy Satti, J. Plaintiff in O.S. No. 42 of 2006 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Puttur filed the above second appeal.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties to this judgment are referred to as they were arrayed in the plaint.

3. Plaintiff filed suit O.S. No. 42 of 2006 seeking partition of plaint schedule properties. Plaintiff and 2nd defendant are daughters of late Anandaiah and 1st defendant. 3rd defendant is sister of said Anandaiah and 4th defendant is her husband. Defendants 5 and 6 are followers of defendants 3 and 4.

4. In the plaint, it was contended inter alia that Anandaiah died on 23.07.2005 leaving behind plaintiff, defendants 1 and 2 as his legal heirs; that plaint schedule properties are the ancestral properties of plaintiff, defendants 1 and 2 and they have been in possession and enjoyment of the same along with late Anandaiah; that defendants 3 and 4, sister and brother-in-law of late Anandaiah, taking advantage of his vices, causing lot of troubles and creating several nominal documents; that the plaintiff is not aware of the nominal documents; that Anandaiah had no exclusive right to execute any document; that the plaintiff got married in the y