SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1091

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI
D. Ramesh, J.
Gedela Rama Rao & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 23250 of 2022
Decided On : 29-07-2022

Advocates appeared:
S. Srinivasa Rao, Advocate, for the Appellant; GP, for the Respondents

A person in settled possession cannot be forcibly dispossessed without following due process of law, as it would violate human rights and the constitutional right under Article 300A of the Constitution.

Headnote:

Possession - Property Dispute - The court directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the subject property without following due process of law, based on settled possession.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought to prevent interference with their peaceful possession of houses granted to them, alleging attempts by local political forces to forcibly evict them.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners were in possession of the disputed property and relied on settled law that a person in settled possession cannot be forcibly dispossessed without due process of law.

Issues: Interference with peaceful possession, attempt to forcibly evict, settled possession, due process of law

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the principle that forcibly dispossessing citizens of their private property without following due process of law would violate human rights and the constitutional right under Article 300A of the Constitution.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the subject property except by following due process of law, and disposed of the Writ Petition with this direction.

JUDGMENT

D. Ramesh, J. - This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed seeking to direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession of the petitioners with regard to subject houses admeasuring an extent of Ac. 0.021/2 cents to each situated in Sy. No. 18P, Door No. 35-20A, Srinivasanagar Colony, Killipalem, Srikakulam Municipal Corporation, Srikakulam Town and District with Assessment No. 1085043365.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that initially, the 1st petitioner was granted an house site patta to an extent of Ac. 0.021/2 cents situated in Sy. No. 18P of Killipalem, Srikakulam District vide patta in letter No. 1426/87. The 2nd petitioner was given a provisional occupancy by the respondents. Since then, the petitioners were in possession of the said land without any disturbance from any corner. The petitioners have raised houses thereon and living there with their family members without any disturbance. While so, some local political forces are trying to grab the house of the petitioners and they are influencing the authorities to forcibly evict from the subject land. Aggrieved by the same, the present Writ Petition is filed.

3. The material on record prima facie establishes that the petitioners are in possession of the disputed property.

4. It is settled law that a person in settled possession cannot be dispossessed forcibly, as held in Rame Gowda (dead) by L.Rs. Vs. M. Varadappa Naidu(dead) by L.Rs. & Anr, Wherein the Apex Court held as follows:-

    '... to forcibly dispossess citizens of their private property, without following due process of law would be to violate a human right, as also the constitutional right under Article 300A of the Constitution.'

    5. Hence, without recording any findings, based on the possession of the property by the petitioners, the respondents are directed not to dispossess the petitioners from the subject property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 0.021/2 cents to each situated in Sy. No. 18P, Door No. 35-20A, Srinivasanagar Colony, Killipalem, Srikakulam Municipal Corporation, Srikakulam Town and District except by following due process of law.

    6. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

    Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

    Writ Petition is disposed of (VSO)

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top