SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1365

CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
D. Ashok – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Madala Narasinga Rao, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy J. - This criminal revision case is preferred by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 08.04.2022 passed in Crl.M.P.No.685 of 2022 in C.C.No.518 of 2016 on the file of the learned additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kandukur, whereby the petition filed under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C to recall the NBW issued by him was dismissed.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned additional Public Prosecutor for the 1st respondent/State. Since the order pertains to dismissal of petition filed to recall the NBW, no notice is required to be issued to the 2nd respondent.

3. The petitioner is the sole accused in C.C.No.518 of 2016 on the file of the learned additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kandukur. He is being prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments act, 1881. It appears that owing to the absence of the petitioner in the said Court that NBW was issued against him. Thereafter, he has filed petition for recall of the said NBW under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C. The said petition came to be dismissed by the impugned order on the ground that the petitioner did not furnish the sureties.

4.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top