D. RAMESH
Uttaradi Srivaishnava Mutt @ Moola Mutt – Appellant
Versus
Collector – Respondent
JUDGMENT
D.Ramesh, J. - Heard Sri Y.V. Ravi Prasad, senior counsel appearing for Sri P.Rajasekar, learned counsel for the appellant and of Sri T.Laxmi Narayana, counsel appearing for Sri Dorai Raj, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The appellant herein is plaintiff-Mutt filed the present appeal, aggrieved by the decree and judgment in O.S.No.439 of 2005 dated 10.04.2012 passed by the additional Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati.
3. For sake of convenience, the appellant herein is referred to be as plaintiff and the respondents herein referred to be as defendants. The brief facts of the case and observations of the court below are as follows:
4. The plaintiff is a Mutt. The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of plaint schedule properties 'a' and 'B' as they are the absolute properties of the plaintiff-Mutt and for granting permanent injunction, restraining the defendants not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit properties.
5. The case of the plaintiff is that- Uttaradhi Srivaishnava Mutt popularly known as Moola Mutt has been in existence for the past 100 years in Tirumala. Mutt was started with an intention to meet the needs of Vaishnava cult. The idols o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.