SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 614

RAVI NATH TILHARI
Ravuri Murali Krishna – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Heard Sri. Y. Soma Raju, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Sri. Viswanath Challa, Advocate appearing for Sri. S. Vivek Chandra Sekhar, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and Ms. Shilpa, Advocate, appearing for Respondent No.6.

2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for Writ of Mandamus with respect to the inaction of the Respondents in not considering the Petitioner's complaint, dtd. 18/7/2022, as also for a direction to the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to take appropriate action on the Petitioner's complaint.

3. The prayer in the Writ Petition, is as follows:

    ".......pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the inaction of the Respondents in not considering the Petitioner Complaint dt. 18/07/2022 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, violation of principles of natural justice, violation of Articles 14, 19(g) and consequently direct to the Respondents to consider the Petitioner Complaint dt. 18/07/2022 and take appropriate action against the Respondent No 6 in accordance with law and to pass........"

4. The Petitioner's complaint related to the election of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top