SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 616

K. MANMADHA RAO
D. Venkata Narayna – Appellant
Versus
D. Polamma(died) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dtd. 28/11/2017 passed in I.A.No.1344 of 2016 in O.S. No.141 of 2009 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa.

2. The petitioner herein is the defendant and the respondents are the plaintiffs in the OS No.141 of 2009. I.A No.141 of 2009 was filed under Sec. 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 130 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte order.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the respondents herein are the plaintiffs filed suit against the petitioner herein for grant of permanent injunction. The above suit was filed by the grandmother of the respondent against the petitioner herein for cancellation of gift deed dtd. 17/3/2008 executed by her in favour of the petitioner. Pending suit, the respondent died. Therefore, her legal representatives were added in the suit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to ill ness the counsel for the petitioner in the lower court was unable to proceed with case in time to take steps for setting aside the ex parte decree passed on 7/1/2016, therefore, requests this Court to condone the delay of 130 days in filing the petition under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top