A. V. SESHA SAI, R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Y. S. R. University Of Health Sciences – Appellant
Versus
Parvatha Reddy Chandrahasa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.Raghunandan Rao, J.
Heard Sri G.Vijay Kumar, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellants, Smt.Jyothi Eswar Gogineni, the learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 8, the learned Government Pleader for Medical and Health, appearing for respondent No.9 and Sri Vivek Chandrasekhar, the learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.10.
2. The facts giving rise to the present Writ Appeal are as follows:
The 1st respondent-University had conducted the main examinations for final year MBBS Part-II (Theory and Practicals) in December-2022/January-2023. Some students including the respondents 1 to 8 herein were not successful in passing the said examination. Some of these unsuccessful students, including the 1st respondent herein, had approached this Court, by way of W.P.No.6977 of 2023, with the complaint that the practical examinations conducted in the 11th respondent-College had not been conducted properly and a very large percentage of the students had been failed, in an arbitrary manner, in the practical examinations. A learned Single Judge of this Court, after considering the submissions made by all sides, had disposed of the said Writ Petition by an order d
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of providing evidence and demonstrating a violation of rights or regulations when seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constituti....
Education Law - National Eligibility cum Entrance Test - Extension of date of completion of internship - Respondents have already extended cut-off date for completion of the internship, keeping in mi....
Judicial discretion in extending eligibility deadlines for medical examinations should be exercised cautiously, respecting established procedures and avoiding arbitrary interventions based on individ....
There is no gainsaying that poor infrastructural facility had had adverse impact on the performance of the students who were already under the examination-tension. Therefore, it is not apt to attribu....
Point of law: Court is sympathetic to the passionate claim that has been made by the petitioner seeking for the extension of the cut-off date for completion of the internship. However, sympathy by it....
The decision to conduct the NEET UG 2022 examination within a stipulated timeline is an administrative function and a matter of policy domain, which cannot be interfered with by the courts, unless it....
The court held that postponement of scheduled examinations requires manifest arbitrariness to warrant judicial intervention, and mere hardships faced by some students do not suffice to disrupt establ....
NEET-PG 2022 examination – Postponement of any examination is replete with serious consequences – Needs of patient care and treatment must be paramount in clash of rival interests between those docto....
Courts should defer to the wisdom of administrators in academic institutions and regulatory authorities in matters concerning academic policies, including admission criteria, unless shown to be plain....
Court cannot find this to be in any manner in conflict to public policy; but is, in fact, in best public interest, in ultimate analysis.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.