IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A.V. SESHA SAI, R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, JJ.
Dr Y.S.R. University Of Health Sciences – Appellant
Versus
Parvatha Reddy Chandrahasa – Respondent
Writ Appeal No.665 of 2023
Decided on : 10-07-2023
Supplementary Examinations - University Regulations - [Medical Council of India Regulation] - The court considered the Medical Council of India Regulation which stipulates that supplementary examinations should be held not later than 6 months after the publication of results. The court rejected the contention that the examinations cannot be conducted in August 2023, as the results were published in February 2023. The court also dismissed the claim that the cutoff date for qualifying for the NEET P.G Entrance Examination of 2024 would be 11.08.2024, as the respondents failed to provide evidence for this.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a dispute over the scheduling of supplementary examinations for MBBS students. The respondents sought preponement of the examinations, citing violation of Medical Council of India guidelines and potential impact on their eligibility for the NEET P.G. Examination.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the scheduling of the supplementary examinations was in compliance with the Medical Council of India Regulation and dismissed the respondents' claims regarding the cutoff date for the NEET P.G Entrance Examination.
Issues: The key issues included the compliance with Medical Council of India Regulation for supplementary examinations and the validity of the claimed cutoff date for the NEET P.G Entrance Examination.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the scheduling of examinations was not in violation of any regulation and that the respondents failed to provide evidence for the claimed cutoff date for the NEET P.G Entrance Examination.
Final Decision: The Writ Appeal was allowed, setting aside the order of the learned single Judge, and there was no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending in the case were closed.
JUDGMENT :
R.Raghunandan Rao, J.
Heard Sri G.Vijay Kumar, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellants, Smt.Jyothi Eswar Gogineni, the learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 8, the learned Government Pleader for Medical and Health, appearing for respondent No.9 and Sri Vivek Chandrasekhar, the learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.10.
2. The facts giving rise to the present Writ Appeal are as follows:
The 1st respondent-University had conducted the main examinations for final year MBBS Part-II (Theory and Practicals) in December-2022/January-2023. Some students including the respondents 1 to 8 herein were not successful in passing the said examination. Some of these unsuccessful students, including the 1st respondent herein, had approached this Court, by way of W.P.No.6977 of 2023, with the complaint that the practical examinations conducted in the 11th respondent-College had not been conducted properly and a very large percentage of the students had been failed, in an arbitrary manner, in the practical examinations. A learned Single Judge of this Court, after considering the submissions made by all sides, had disposed of the said Writ Petition by an order dated 03.04.2023, directing the 1st appellant and 10th respondent herein to re-conduct the practical examinations in three subjects viz., General Medicine, General Surgery and Pediatrics, within two weeks from the date of the order and to release the results as soon as practicable. Certain other directions were also issued in this order. However, the same need not detain us. Accordingly, practical examinations were re-conducted for the petitioners, in the said Writ Petition, on 12.04.2023.
3. The 1stAppellant-University had initially issued a notification stating that supplementary examinations for the 4th year MBBS Part-II for the year 2022-2023 would be conducted as per schedule from 10.05.2023 to 24.05.2023 (Theory) and Practical Examinations from 05.06.2023 onwards. While matter stood thus, the 1st respondent in compliance of the directions of this Court mentioned above, had re-conducted the practical examination on 12.04.2023 and announced the results of the said examination on 17.04.2023. The 1stAppellant also issued another notification dated 17.04.2023 stating that supplementary examinations proposed to be conducted in May, 2023 were being postponed. No fresh date was given at this stage. Subsequently, on 29.05.2023 a notification was issued by the 1st Appellant setting out the revised time table for the supplementary examinations. Under this time table, the supplementary theory examinations were to be conducted between 09.08.2023 to 23.08.2023 and the practical examinations were to be held from 26.08.2023 onwards (tentatively). By then, a representation was given by a member of the Legislative Council to the 1st respondent, on 12.05.2023, seeking preponement of the said supplementary examinations as it would affect the chances of the students appearing for the NEET P.G Entrance Examination, 2024.
4. The respondents 1 to 8 in the present Writ Appeal had moved W.P.No.13822 of 2023 before this Court, seeking a direction to the appellants herein for preponing the supplementary examinations as the conduct of the examinations in August, 2022 would be in violation of the guidelines given by the Medical Council of India stipulating that the examinations cannot be conducted beyond six months from the primary examinations which was conducted in Decmber-2022/January-2023. The prayer in W.P.No.13822 of 2022 is as follows:
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of providing evidence and demonstrating a violation of rights or regulations when seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constituti....
Education Law - National Eligibility cum Entrance Test - Extension of date of completion of internship - Respondents have already extended cut-off date for completion of the internship, keeping in mi....
Judicial discretion in extending eligibility deadlines for medical examinations should be exercised cautiously, respecting established procedures and avoiding arbitrary interventions based on individ....
There is no gainsaying that poor infrastructural facility had had adverse impact on the performance of the students who were already under the examination-tension. Therefore, it is not apt to attribu....
Point of law: Court is sympathetic to the passionate claim that has been made by the petitioner seeking for the extension of the cut-off date for completion of the internship. However, sympathy by it....
The decision to conduct the NEET UG 2022 examination within a stipulated timeline is an administrative function and a matter of policy domain, which cannot be interfered with by the courts, unless it....
The court held that postponement of scheduled examinations requires manifest arbitrariness to warrant judicial intervention, and mere hardships faced by some students do not suffice to disrupt establ....
NEET-PG 2022 examination – Postponement of any examination is replete with serious consequences – Needs of patient care and treatment must be paramount in clash of rival interests between those docto....
Courts should defer to the wisdom of administrators in academic institutions and regulatory authorities in matters concerning academic policies, including admission criteria, unless shown to be plain....
Court cannot find this to be in any manner in conflict to public policy; but is, in fact, in best public interest, in ultimate analysis.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.