Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Arman Sindhu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks extension of internship completion date. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding pandemic impact on exam schedule. (Para 2 , 10) |
| 3. regulatory timeline adaptations noted due to covid-19. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. petition seeks multiple writs for extending deadlines. (Para 8) |
| 5. government agencies respond to petition. (Para 9) |
| 6. precedent judgments referenced against petitioner's claim. (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 19) |
| 7. court emphasizes limits of judicial intervention in academic timelines. (Para 16 , 18) |
| 8. agreement with madras high court’s decision regarding cut-off dates. (Para 20) |
| 9. writ petition dismissed without costs. (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner is a doctor. He has completed the MBBS course from Rohilkhand Medical College, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh and wishes to pursue a post graduate degree. The grievance with which he has approached the Court is that the respondents have fixed 30.09.2021 as the last date for completion of the compulsory one-year rotational internship to enable a candidate to participate in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Post Graduate) [hereinafter, "NEETPG"] examination to be held on 11.09.2021.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
