SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 686

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J.
Dr. N. Ramesh Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
The Election Commission of India, rep. by Chief Election Commissioner – Respondent
Writ Petition No.21231 of 2021
Decided On : 13-07-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: N. Ashwani Kumar.
For the Respondent: Avinash Desai.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of permanent residence and intention to dwell permanently in a place to be considered 'ordinarily resident' for voter registration under the Representation of the People Act, 1950.

Headnote:

Residence - Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Section 23(1), Section 24 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 19 and Section 20 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, which define the conditions of registration as a voter and the meaning of 'ordinarily resident'. The court emphasized the requirement of permanent residence and intention to dwell permanently in a place to be considered 'ordinarily resident' for voter registration. The court also highlighted the interpretation of 'ordinarily resident' and the deeming clauses under Section 20, and how they influenced the decision.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a retired State Election Commissioner, sought to register as a voter in his native village. His application was rejected as he was found not to be 'ordinarily resident' in the village, based on evidence of his actual residence and occasional visits to the village.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's occasional visits and expression of intention to settle in the village after retirement were not sufficient to establish 'ordinarily resident' status for voter registration.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner met the legal requirement of being 'ordinarily resident' in his native village for voter registration.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's actual residence and intention to dwell permanently in the village were necessary to establish 'ordinarily resident' status for voter registration, as per the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1950.

Final Decision: The Writ Petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was advised to submit a fresh application if he actually settled in the village after his retirement, meeting the legal requirements for voter registration.

ORDER :

1. Assailing the order, dated 02.09.2021, passed by the 2nd respondent, dismissing the second appeal preferred by the petitioner, and rejecting his claim to register his name as a voter in the elector roll of Duggirala Village of 87-Mangalagiri Assembly Constituency, the present Writ Petition for a mandamus has been filed by the petitioner.

2. Factual matrix of the lis may briefly be stated as follows:

The petitioner is originally the resident of Duggirala village. He was born and brought up in the said village and he has pursued his studies in the said village. Thereafter, he was selected for Indian Administrative Service and he was allotted to the cadre of the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh. In pursuance of his employment in the Indian Administrative Service, he resided at various places where he was posted during the period of his employment in the State of Andhra Pradesh. He retired on 31.03.2016 on attaining the age of superannuation. On the next day, i.e. on 01.04.2016, he was appointed as State Election Commissioner of the Andhra Pradesh State Election Commission, for a period of five years. He assumed charge as the State Election Commissioner of the Andhra Pradesh State Election Commission on 01.04.2016. While he was working as the State Election Commissioner, he has submitted an application in Form-VI on 21.12.2020 for inclusion of his name as a voter as the resident of house bearing D.No.2-54, Main Road of Duggirala village in electoral roll of the 87-Mangalagiri Assembly Constituency, under Section 23(1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, to the Electoral Registration Officer of 87-Mangalagiri Assembly Constituency-cum-Special Deputy Collector.

3. The Electoral Registration Officer enquired into the matter and as his enquiry revealed that the petitioner is not the “ordinarily resident” of Duggirala village and that he is not residing in the house bearing D.No.2-54, Main Road of Duggirala village, he has rejected his application by his order, dated 21.01.2021. Aggrieved thereby, he has preferred an appeal to the District Election Officer, Guntur, challenging the legal validity of the order of the Electoral Registration Officer. The first appellate Authority, by his order, dated 01.04.2021, has dismissed the said appeal affirming the order of the Electoral Registration Officer. It is held in his order that the petitioner is not found to be ordinarily residing in Duggirala village in the house bearing D.No.2-54 of the said village and he also recorded a finding to that effect and dismissed the appeal.

4. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has preferred second appeal, as contemplated under Section 24 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Appellate Authority, Andhra Pradesh. The second appellate Authority, by his order, dated 02.09.2021, has also dismissed the said appeal confirming the orders of the Electoral Registration Officer and the first appellate Authority, as the second appellate Authority also found that the petitioner is not the ordinarily resident of Duggirala village as he is not residing in the given address in the house bearing No.2-54 of the said village.

5. Therefore, aggrieved by the impugned order of the second appellate Authority, the instant Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for a mandamus, challenging the legal validity of the said order and to set aside the impugned order and sought direction to the respondents to register the name of the petitioner as a voter in the electoral roll of the 87-Mangalagiri Assembly Constituency.

6. The 2nd respondent – Chief Electoral Officer and the Appellate Authority, filed counter-affidavit opposing the claim of the writ petitioner. It is pleaded that the application, dated 21.12.2020, submitted by the petitioner, to register him as a voter as the resident of the house bearing D.No.2-54, Main Road, Duggirala village, in the electoral roll of the 87- Mangalagiri Assembly Constituency,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top