SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 704

D. V. S. S. SOMAYAJULU, V. SRINIVAS
M. Venkateswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
D. Indeevar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr.Motupalli Vijay Kumar, Senior Counsel Mr. Manoj Kumar Bethapudi, Mr. P. Veera Reddy, Senior counsel, Mr. K.Jyothi Prasad, Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao, Senior counsel, Mr. Srinivasa Rao Bodduluri, Mr. J. Sudheer, Mrs. Kavitha Gottipati, Mr. S. Srinivasa Rao, Mr.Prof.Y. Ashok Kumar (Party in person)
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Harinath, Mrs.A.V.S.Laxmi, Mr.N.A.Ramachandra, Murthy, SC for APPSC, Mr.V. Venkata Nagaraju, SC for APPSC, Mr.Penjuri Venugopal, SC for JNTUA, Mrs.S. Parineeta, Mr. J. Ugranarasimha, Mr.Rambabu Koppineedi, SC for ANU, Mr. T.S.N. Sudhakar, SC for Krishna Univ., Mr.Raja Reddy Koneti, Mrs.Y.Ratna Prabha, SC for Rayalaseema Univ., Mr.S. Appadar Reddy, Mr.Butta Vijaya Bhaskar, SC for SVU, Mrs.M.Manikya Veena, SC for Padmavati, Mahila Univ., Mr.M. Chinnapa Reddy, SC for VSU Univ., Mrs.Padmavathi Padnavis, SC for DUK, Mr.Siva Prasad Reddy Venati, Mr.Bathula Rajkiran, SC for JNTU, Mrs.Pulipati Radhika, Mr. K.V.Raghuveer, Mr. Tenepalli Niranjan, SC for Y.V.Univ., Mr. P.S.P. Suresh Kumar, Mr. Yella Reddy Rajanala, SC for ANGRAU, Mrs. S. Siva Kuamri, SC for AU

JUDGMENT :

D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU, J.

These Writ Appeals are filed challenging the common order, dated 05.03.2021, passed in W.P.No.10813 of 2018 and Batch by the learned single Judge.

2. The essential issue in these writ appeals and the writ petitions is about the action of the Universities in the State of A.P., grouping of the subjects for the purpose of providing reservations relying upon the judgment of the Division Bench in W.A.No.43260 of 2016 of the Allahabad High Court and other case law. The writ petitioners contend that each department and each subject must be classified as a unit for the purpose of providing reservations. The universities started classifying the entire institution/University or college as a unit. Therefore, the batch of writ petitions were filed and the impugned orders came to be passed. Challenging the same the present set of appeals were filed by the Professors, Assistant Professors and others.

3. Sri B.Adinarayana Rao, learned senior counsel commenced the arguments in this batch of Writ Appeals. According to the learned senior counsel in none of the writ petitions the issue of reservations being provided for Professors was challenged. He also submits that the

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
            whatsapp-icon Back to top