Back
K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Shaik Rubina – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by the petitioner/A-3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.2277 of 2022 on the file of learned I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa.
2. A Charge Sheet has been filed against the petitioner herein and others for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A read with 34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that marriage between the de facto complainant and A-1 took place on 14.02.2021 in the presence of their relatives at Noor-e-marriage hall, Madras Road, Kadapa Town. It is alleged that, at the time of marriage, the parents of de facto complainant gave 15 Tulas of gold jewellery and Rs.5.00 Lakhs as gifts to A-1 as per the wishes of A-1 to A-3. A-1 and the de facto complainant lived happily for some period and the de facto complainant blessed with one daughter namely Pathan Mohavesh Khanam. Thereafter, disputes between A-1 and the de facto complainant arose. It is alleged that the de facto complainant saw her husband/A-1 was chatting with one Rubina on phone and the same was informed to A-2, the mothe
The court emphasized the need to curtail vague and omnibus accusations in dowry harassment cases and prevent the abuse of the court's process.
The importance of specific allegations in cases of matrimonial disputes and the caution against the misuse of Sec. 498-A IPC.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
