Shaik John Bi VS Kota Jagadeeswari

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

BATTU DEVANAND
Shaik John Bi – Appellant
Versus
Kota Jagadeeswari – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : K JYOTHI PRASAD

ORDER :

These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed aggrieved by the order, dated 31.03.2022 in I.A.Nos.287 and 288 of 2021 in O.S.No.671 of 2014 on the file of the IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur.

2) The above two Revision Petitions are filed by the petitioners in the same suit and as such this Court is inclined to pass common order.

3) Heard Sri K. Jyothi Prasad, the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record.

4) The Petitioners are the defendants and the Respondents are the plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 and the Defendant No.4 in O.S.No.671 of 2014, on the file of IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur.

5) The case of the petitioners is that the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed a suit in O.S.No.671 of 2014 for partition against the petitioners and Respondent No.3. Thereafter, the petitioners filed I.A.No.287 & 288 of 2021 to reopen the matter and to recall Pws. 1 to 5 for further cross examination. The trial Court, on erroneous consideration of the facts, dismissed the said Petitions. Aggrieved by the said orders, the present Civil Revision Petitions have been filed.

6) Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the trial Court erred in dismissing the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document