T.AMARNATH GOUD
Mohd. Azeemuddinvs – Appellant
Versus
MOHD ABUZAR – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioners/defendant Nos. 53 and 54, challenging the order, dated 02.03.2020, passed in I.A. No. 27 of 2020 in O.S. No. 240 of 2006 by the Senior Civil Judge, Siddipet, whereby, the petition filed by the petitioners herein under Order XVIII Rule 17 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. to recall PW-1 to face cross-examination by defendant Nos. 53 and 54 the petitioners herein, was dismissed.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners/defendant Nos. 53 and 54 would contend that the Court below without framing additional issues on their additional written statement proceeded further on the issues framed before the impleadment of the petitioner herein. The Court below failed to appreciate that the plaintiff sought for partition of 7/308th share without seeking for separate possession of his share and therefore the suit is not maintainable. The Court below erred in not observing that the plaintiffs are negligent in prosecuting the case though filed in the year 2006. The order of the Court below impugned herein is curta
There is no infirmity or illegality in the order under challenge.
The court emphasized that allowing repeated cross-examination without valid reasons would cause hardship to the witnesses and that petitions filed at a belated stage without merits would not be consi....
The court established that under the Code of Civil Procedure, the power to reopen evidence and recall witnesses is essential for ensuring a fair trial and can be exercised at any stage of the proceed....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.