SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
State of Andhra Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Ejarla Badarinath, S/o. Subbaiah – Respondent


ORDER :

Crime No.128 of 2022 was registered at SEB Station, Gooty against some accused persons for illicit distillation of liquor. On the basis of the statement/confession given by accused No.1 in the case, about 3000 kgs of Black Jaggery and 60 kg of White Jaggery were seized from the respondent/accused No.2. Thereupon, the respondent had approached the Magistrate for release of the said seized Jaggery by way of Crl.M.P.No.255 of 2022, under Section 451 of Cr.P.C and the same was allowed on 21.07.2022.

2. Aggrieved by the said order of Crl.R.P.No.36 of 2022 was filed before the VI Additional Sessions Court, Ananthapuramu. This petition was dismissed on 20.09.2022. Aggrieved by the said order of dismissal the State has approached this Court by way of the present Criminal Petition.

3. The issue raised in the present case is whether the Magistrate had jurisdiction to consider an application for release of Jaggery. The learned Public Prosecutor relies upon Section 13(E) of the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act which reads as follows: -

    “Bar of Jurisdiction - Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974) when the Deputy Commissioner of Proh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top