IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J.
B.V.V.Ramana Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 8642 of 2021
Decided on : 14-12-2022
CCA rules - Rule 20 and 21 - Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal) Act, 1960 - Andhra Pradesh Lokayukta and Upa-lokayukta Act, 1983 - Regularization of services - Removal from service - Petition aggrieved by action of respondents in removing petitioner from post of Ground Level Reservoir Operator without any charge memo and without conducting enquiry as contemplated under Rule 20 of CCA Rules as illegal and liable to be set aside – Held, Allegation of respondents that regularization proceedings was fake and fabricated is without proper enquiry or complaint by concerned Authority but, invented for purpose of termination of services of petitioner in year 2017 after lapse of 5 years, contrast to facts that, then local authority passed resolution and implemented regular scale to petitioner and later, a special grade scales are also granted by 4th respondent indicated that petitioner services were duly regularized, not in accordance with G.O.Ms. But due to entitlement by rendering 20 years of service - Petitioner is not a regular employee, rule 20 and 21 of CCA rules are not applicable to petitioner, is untenable and erroneous in view of series of proceedings issued by respondents and continuation of services of petitioner as last grade regular employee since 1991 - Petition is allowed by setting aside impugned removal order and also, order in appeal and petitioner is entitled to all consequential monetary benefits to post of petitioner - Writ Petition is allowed.
ORDER :
The present Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner having aggrieved by the action of the respondents herein in removing the petitioner from the post of Ground Level Reservoir Operator (now removed from service), Hukumpet Gram Panchayat Rajamahendravaram Rural, East Godavari District without any charge memo and without conducting enquiry as contemplated under Rule 20 of CCA Rules as illegal and liable to be set aside the removal orders vide proceedings No.47711/2017-A5, dated 07.07.2017 and consequential order passed in appeal vide proceedings No.880114/CPR&RD/N3/2019, dated 11.01.2021.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services – II & IV.
3. The case of the petitioner in brief is that, the petitioner herein was initially appointed as GLR Motor Tank Operator on 01.04.1981 at Hukumpet Gram Panchayat on payment of Rs.60/-per month and continued in service and by extending the service of the petitioner from time to time on temporary basis. Later, the respondent sanctioned minimum time scale to the petitioner on par with NMR/Daily wages, vide proceedings No.5362/91 dated 11.06.1991. Thereafter, enhanced the salary of Rs.900/- per month to the post of GLR Operator vide proceedings No.8150/93/A2 dated 18.09.1993. Thereafter, the petitioner was converted into Last Grade Service from 01.07.1994 in the minimum time scale of Rs.1372-25-1475-30-2375.
4. Petitioner is working at Hukumpeta G.P. Then it was merged into Rajamundry Municipal Corporation w.e.f. 25.03.1995 vide G.O.Ms. No.159 MA, dated 25.03.1995 and the petitioner worked till 28-02-1996 again the petitioner was sent back to Hukumpeta G.P. Later, the petitioner’s services were regularized and probation also declared vide proceedings No.1169/2012-A6 dated 12-12-2012 in the cadre of GLR Operator w.e.f 01.07.1994 and probation declared from 30.06.1996. Thereafter, the respondents also, sanctioned 8 years and 12 years promotion post scale 1A and SAPP 1B vide Proc.No.112/2014-A8, dated 18.01.2014.
5. Petitioner submitted that, District Panchayat Officer, Rajamundry has submitted service particulars of Panchayat staff working in erwhile, Hukumpeta Grama Panchayat under Rajamundry Rural Mandal to the 4th respondent vide proc.No.152/2017/A2 dated 09.02.2017 in respect of 25 employees who are working in the cadre of Sweeper/GLR Operators/Tank Operators etc., wherein the petitioner’s name is also placed at SI.No.16. But in the said proceedings dated 09.02.2017 it is mentioned that some entries were not made by the Sarpanch. Now the 4th respondent has issued a show cause notice vide file No.47711/2017-A5, dated 12.05.2017 on the ground that the service regularization particulars of the petitioner are not available in the respondent office, therefore there is no evidence that the petitioner’s services were regularized by the Government and called for explanation for removal from service. Thereafter, requested to drop further action, but the 4th respondent straightway, terminated the petitioner form service vide proceedings No.4711/2017-A5 dated 07.07.2017 without issuing any notice or opportunity while issuing charge memo and consequential enquiry as contemplated under Rule 20 and 21 of CCA rules.
6. Petitioner submitted that, the 2nd respondent passed the orders in appeal dated 18.04.2019 and rejected vide impugned proc. No.880114/CPR&RD/N3/2019, dated 11.01.2021 stating that, the 4th respondent/District panchayat officer E.G. District is not the competent authority to regularize the services of the petitioner under the G.O.Ms. No.212, Fin. & Planning Dept. dated 22.04.1994. As per said G.O, the Government is only the competent authority for regularization of services and there is no ground to consider the appeal. Accordingly, Appeal was rejected by confirming the removal order dated 07.07.2017. As such challenging the removal order dated 07.07.2017 and consequential rejection orders in appeal dated 11.01.2021 the present W.P is being filed.
Devendra Kumar v. State of Uttaranchal & Ors. (2013) 9 SCC 363]
Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation & Anr. v. Intejam Ali Zafri
SupremeToday
The court affirmed that employees continuing post-2016 have a right to regularization, and termination orders must be based on valid grounds.
The court emphasized the need for regularization of employees appointed irregularly but possessing the prescribed qualifications and working against sanctioned posts, in line with previous judgments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.