SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
M. GANGA RAO, J.
M.V. Prasad – Petitioner
Versus
Anil Kumar Singhal – Respondent
Contempt Case No. 231 of 2019
Decided On : 07-02-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: A. Bhaskara Chary.
For the Respondent: A. Prabhakar Sarma.

Headnote:

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 10 and 12 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 215 - Contempt Petition - Wilful and deliberate violation of orders - Petitioner filed contempt case alleging wilful and deliberate violation of orders passed by this Court – Held, Petitioner is already a regular employee of respondent-Devasthanam and hence his services could not be regularized again as Computer Operator/Data Entry Operator in absence of sanctioned posts - There is no wilful or deliberate violation of orders passed by this Court under provisions of Section 12 of Act - Court found that respondent-contemnor has not violated orders passed by this Court wilfully and deliberately to punish him under provisions of Section 12 of Act and provisions of Article 215 of Constitution of India - Contempt Case is dismissed.

ORDER :

1. The petitioner filed this contempt case under the provisions of Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (for short ‘the Act’) and also under the provisions of Article 215 of the Constitution of India alleging the wilful and deliberate violation of orders passed by this Court on 31.08.2018 in W.P. No. 16960 of 2001, whereby this Court directed the respondent-Devasthanam to consider the case of the petitioner for absorption as Computer Operator/Data Entry Operator and the said exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of that order.

2. The case of the petitioner is that originally he was selected and enrolled as Home Guard in Chittoor District by the Superintendent of Police outside the sanctioned strength of the District for being deputed to Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam (TTD), Tirupati by proceedings dated 19.03.1991 of the Superintendent of Police, Chittoor and kept at the disposal of TTD’s Home Guards, a voluntary organization. He was deputed to the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer of the TTD on 27.04.1991 and he was paid Rs.74.75 Ps. per day on NMR basis from the contingency fund of TTD. But, his services were continuously utilized as Computer Operator in the Computer center of the respondent-Devasthanam as he passed B.Sc. (MPC) in Second division in the year 1987 and M.Sc. (Applied Mathematics) in Second division in the year 1990 and he also obtained P.G. Diploma in Computers in the year 1988, as per the request of the Chief Accounts Officer, TTD. As he was qualified to hold the post of Computer Operator and worked as such since 1991, he sought for absorption as Computer Operator, but his services were regularized as Office Subordinate-cum-Watchman along with 97 Security Guards as per the proceedings the Executive Officer, TTD, Tirupati dated 18.02.2016, who were appointed during the period 1990-1992 as Office Subordinate-cum-Watchman with effect from 14.12.1998 extending the monetary benefit with effect from 29.01.2008, as per Rule 5(i) of Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Employees Service Rules, 1989. But, the petitioner services were utilized as Computer Operator. Hence, he seeks absorption/regularization of his services as Computer Operator/Data Entry Operator.

3. The respondent-Devasthanam states that there is no existing sanctioned vacancy of Computer Operator/Data Entry Operator in the TTD establishment rolls and the post of Junior Computer Operator is only sanctioned to the Computer Science Department of TTD Educational Institutions in the Lab Mechanic Cadre with prescribed qualifications, for which the petitioner is not qualified. Since there is a Computer Department in the respondent- Devasthanam and as per the request of the petitioner along with others only, their services were utilized as Computer Operators and now the Devasthanam is utilizing the computer services on outsourcing basis.

4. After considering the rival contentions, this Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondent-Devasthanam to consider the case of the petitioner for absorption as Computer Operator/Data Entry Operator in the respondent-Devasthanam.

5. The respondent-Devasthanam considered the petitioner’s case as per the orders passed by this Court in W.P. No. 16960 of 2001 dated 31.08.2018, by proceedings dated 22.10.2018, by holding thus:

    (i) There is no sanctioned post of Computer Operator/Data Entry Operator in TTD Establishment rolls and the post of Junior Computer Opeartor was sanctioned to the Computer Science Department of TTD Educational Institutions in the Lab Mechanic Cadre only.

(ii) Further, the basic qualifications prescribed for the post of Junior Computer Operator is I Class or II Class B.Sc. (Maths/Electronics/Physics/Computer Science/Statistics) and as could be seen from the Provisional Certificate Disposal No. 2589 II 5/89 Register No. 4682 from the May 1987 of Sri M.V. Prasad has passed B.Sc. (Maths, Physics and Chemistry) in Third Class

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top